查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 臨時動議減資的法律問題--兼論公司法第172條第5項規定法制之檢討=Legal Issue of Reduction in Capital as Extemporary Motion--Review of Legal System of Article 172 Paragraph 5 of the Company Act of Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 楊君仁; | 書刊名 | 法學叢刊 |
卷 期 | 60:2=238 2015.04[民104.04] |
頁 次 | 頁1-37 |
分類號 | 587.253 |
關鍵詞 | 召集程序; 通知及公告; 召集事由; 減資; 變更章程; 臨時動議; 股東會; 法律漏洞; 撤銷決議之訴; 重要性原則; Convening procedure; Notice; Subjects of a shareholders' meeting; Shareholders' meeting; Alteration of the articles of incorporation; Reduction in capital; Extemporary motion; Legal loophole; Annulment of resolution; Relevanztheorie; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 公司實務常見公司利用股東會臨時動議的方式通過減資案,其主要論據乃是公司法第 172 條第 5 項之規定,減資非屬召集事由應明列事項,故得以臨時動議提出。問題是,如此解釋適用該法條,除了明顯誤解法條文義外,亦屬對拉丁法諺「省略規定之事項,應為有意省略」、「明示其一,排除其他」之誤用,完全不合現行公司法制與法理。而且,公司法第 172 條第 5 項之應載明於股東會召集事由之列舉規定,其違反者股東會之決議得撤銷,問題是,此法律效果既等同於違反同法第 172 條第 4 項之規定,那又何必具體列明,其法制上之考量為何?或者是應從通知公告載明召集事由之整體公司法制根本性地闡明,實有檢討之必要。 |
英文摘要 | It happens often in our company practices that companies carry out reduction in capital by way of an extemporary motion. Its main argument is that the subject of capital reduction is not itemized in the provisions of Section 172, Paragraph 5 of the Company Act Taiwan and therefore shall be brought up as extemporary motions. The problem is that such interpretation of the applicable law, obviously misunderstandding not only law provisions, but also the essence of Latin legal maxim “Casus omissus pro omisso habendus est”, “Expressio unius est exclusion alterius”. Moreover, the provisions in Article 172 paragraph 5 of the Act elaborate the discussion in the shareholders’ meeting should be enumerated. Otherwise, the resolutions may be revoked. The fundamental problem is that this is a violation of the legal effect of Article 172 paragraph 4 of the Act. There are legal considerations of specifically listing discussion issues. We are going to review the legal system fundamentally in this article. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。