查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從「道地」到「對道地的想像」:媒介社會中一種社會自我觀察的可能起點
- 地方的概念在若干學術領域上的意義與應用
- 區域尺度的風格研究--一個地理學實踐的核心議題
- Alternate Methods for Construction of Design Response Spectrum
- 大陸經濟改革--地方政府角色之變遷
- The Sense of Place, The Inscription and Wordsworth's 'Poems on the Naming of Places'
- 創造地方教育輔導的新境界
- 即時加速度型地震觀測網之波相到時自動撿拾系統
- 臺灣省各鄉鎮市志之纂修--以近五年纂修完成者為例
- 各期入幕曾國藩幕府隸籍、出身並官幕私誼之比較分析, 1853-1872
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從「道地」到「對道地的想像」:媒介社會中一種社會自我觀察的可能起點=From "Authenticity" to the "Imagination of Authenticity": An Alternative Point of Departure for Society's Self-Observation |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉育成; 曹家榮; | 書刊名 | 政治與社會哲學評論 |
卷期 | 46 2013.09[民102.09] |
頁次 | 頁37-79 |
分類號 | 541.1 |
關鍵詞 | 道地; 不道地; 地方; 媒介社會; 加速; 透明社會; Authenticity; Inauthenticity; Place; Media society; Acceleration; Transparent society; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 何謂「道地」(authenticity)?「道地」(或不道地)的論述又是從何而來?如果道地與否關乎的是主觀感受,而非客觀標準的話,那麼試圖從客觀角度來檢視道地與否的問題具有何種意涵?如果僅將道地與否簡化為社會建構的產物,那麼我們如何理解人類社會從古至今在不斷想要釐清、爭辯、解決道地與否之問題上的努力?本文將從Charles Taylor對「本真性」的討論出發,輔以班雅明、David Harvey等人的論述,最後則以Vattimo有關「透明社會」的討論,試圖論述以下觀點:這個時代也許不需要「道地」,我們只需要有對道地的「想像」。本文也將論述,日常生活社會本身具有的道地性,在速度吊詭所開展的辯證過程中,也加深、增廣了對道地之想像的需要。更甚者,社會越是有對道地進行觀察與描述的需要,就越有可能生產出不道地的論述,並且透過不道地的論述來認識道地性。假如社會中不存在純然的道地性,或者我們不再有機會觸及道地性,為什麼我們仍必須將其視為日常生活與社會中重要的面向?我們對道地的想像又是如何關連於社會對自身的觀察與描述呢? |
英文摘要 | What is ”authenticity”? Why do we need ”authenticity”? How do people know whether it is authentic or not? The questions mentioned above are concerned with the relationships between people, people and society, and connect closely to how people and society understand themselves. The experience of authenticity/inauthenticity implies not only subjective knowing but also objective formation and understanding of it. This essay examines the concept of authenticity and its opposite, and suggests an alternative to access it. Through the lens of Charles Taylor, Walter Benjamin, David Harvey, we extract some shared thoughts among their discussion of the concept of authenticity/inauthenticity. At the last part of this article we suggest that, pace Gianni Vattimo's questioning of the ”transparency” of modern/media society, there is no need to find or to testify ”authenticity”, rather there exists and requires only the ”imagination” of it. To a great extent influenced by technological advancements it is not unnecessary to access authenticity, instead the requirement of it has been broadens and deepens than ever before. The more we need to pursue authenticity, the more we fall into the production of inauthentic discourses. This will be another starting point in understanding how modern society describes and observes itself. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。