查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 《杜威十進分類法》與《中文圖書分類法》之文學類分類比較研究=A Comparison of Literature Classification Schemes in Dewey Decimal Classification and New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries |
---|---|
作者 | 張郁蔚; Chang, Yu-wei; |
期刊 | 圖書資訊學研究 |
出版日期 | 20120600 |
卷期 | 6:2 2012.06[民101.06] |
頁次 | 頁115-137 |
分類號 | 023.3 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 杜威十進分類法; 中文圖書分類法; 文學類分類; Dewey Decimal Classification; New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries; Literature classification; |
中文摘要 | 本文旨在從分類號配置及其建立方式,比較《杜威十進分類法》和《中文圖書分類法》之文學類分類之異同。研究結果顯示《杜威十進分類法》的文學類類號建立方式有相當高的一致性,依序以語言、體裁及時間劃分類目,偏重英語文學;《中文圖書分類法》的文學類類目依國家及體裁順序劃分,僅部分國家文學著作可再依時間複分,偏重中國文學。建議《中文圖書分類法》使用共同複分表,對各國文學建立一致性之分類號,以減輕使用者之學習負擔。 |
英文摘要 | This study aims to investigate the differences of Literature classification schemes between Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) and New Classification Scheme for Chinese Libraries (CCL). Two areas were examined, including the scope of classification and the ways to build up classification numbers. The findings reveal that DDC prefers English literature and has a high consistency of citation order. Literary works are arranged by language, then by form and historical period. In contrast, CCL focuses on Chinese literature and arranges literary works by country and then by form. The literature published by some countries can be further divided by historical period. This study suggests that CCL can improve the consistency of building up classification numbers using subdivision tables for literature. This will reduce the burden of learning CCL. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。