第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 試論1934年滿洲國實施帝制的論述與時人認識=The Discourse about the Founding of Manchukuo Monarchy in 1934 |
---|---|
作者 | 黃昱翰; | 書刊名 | 暨南史學 |
卷期 | 17 2014.07[民103.07] |
頁次 | 頁43-72 |
專輯 | 滿洲國史專號 |
分類號 | 628.4 |
關鍵詞 | 滿洲國; 溥儀; 盛京時報; 帝制運動; 穆儒丐; Manchukuo; Puyi; Shengjing Shibao; Imperial system movement; Mu Rugai; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目前的研究者普遍認為,1934年滿洲國皇帝制度的成立是關東軍強化對滿控制的手段。在逐漸加強集權的同時,滿洲國當局也必須建構論述,以建立實施帝制的正當性。滿洲國的建國理論批判辛亥革命以來的混亂政局,並強調歷史上滿洲獨立於中國之外。但為了支持溥儀出任國家元首,論者不得不援引溥儀作為前清遜帝的身分爭取人民支持。類似的論調亦可見於滿洲國的「帝制運動」,強調溥儀本是滿洲諸民族的共主。但與此同時,溥儀本身欠缺政治資歷,因此輿論宣傳只能選擇強調溥儀的個人資質與德行。關東軍不願民眾將滿洲國帝制與滿清復辟聯想起來,因此在論述與儀禮的設計上強調滿洲國的近代性。但從穆儒丐的紀實中,仍可發現帝制的支持者依然傾向於認同滿洲國作為滿清的延續。滿洲國帝制的正當性與清代歷史遺產是難以分割的。 |
英文摘要 | It is commonly agreed that the Kwantung Army tried to strengthen its control over Manchuria through the foundation of Manchukuo (滿洲國) Monarchy. To support and justify the monarchy, the Kwantung Army had to establish a series of discourse. The Manchukuo authority emphasized Puyi's status as abdicated Qing emperor to support him to become the head of the state. Puyi (溥儀) was sculptured as the common leader of all the races in Manchuria. However, because of lack of political experience, the propaganda materials could only focus on Puyi's personality and integrity. To weaken the connection between Manchukuo monarchy and Qing restoration, the Kwantung Army tried to decrease the traditional characteristics in the design of ceremony. For the supporters of Puyi, however, their identity toward Qing was the foundation of their loyalty to Manchukuo. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。