查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 保險法第45條及第52條規定之研究--兼評臺灣高等法院100年度保險上易字第4號民事判決
- 論我國保險法上受益人之適用範圍--兼評析兩則最高法院判決
- 2009年大陸保險法修正評析
- 受益人之規定於財產保險有無適用?兼評臺灣高等法院一○三年度保險上易字第二十二號民事判決
- 兩岸保險法之研究--以人壽保險契約為範圍
- 人壽保險受益人請求權探討--兼評最高法院七十六年臺上字第一八○號判例
- 死亡保險中受益人之確定--兼評臺灣高等法院暨所屬法院七十四年法律座談會
- 保險受益人法律地位之研究--兼評最高法院八十五年臺上字第二五八六號判決
- 現行保險法有關保險利益之研究
- 論財產保險契約之被保險人、受益人及保險利益--評最高法院八十七年度臺上字第二四一七號判決
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 保險法第45條及第52條規定之研究--兼評臺灣高等法院100年度保險上易字第4號民事判決=A Study on Article 45 & 52 of Insurance Act--Focused on Taiwan High Court Civil Judgment Bao Sian-Shan-Yi No.4 (2011) |
---|---|
作者 | 羅俊瑋; 熊開泰; Lo, Chun-wei; Hsiung, Kai-tai; |
期刊 | 法令月刊 |
出版日期 | 20150200 |
卷期 | 66:2 2015.02[民104.02] |
頁次 | 頁41-57 |
分類號 | 587.5 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 保險法; 受益人; 第三人利益契約; 保險利益; 死亡保險; Insurance act; Beneficiary; Contract for the third party; Insurable interest; Death insurance; |
中文摘要 | 受益人為於保險事故發生時,享有對保險人請求給付保險金之人。保險契約中對於保險受益人之指定與民法第269條所規定之第三人利益契約之規定多所類似,然兩者間尚有差異。於我國保險法,人身保險有受益人規定之適用,但於財產保險是否亦有受益人規定之適用,仍存有爭議。保險法第5條就受益人之定義加以規定,於同法第110至114條則規定受益人之確定方式。於現行保險法第45及第52條亦有就受益人之規定,此兩條文得否作為確認保險受益人之依據,實有討論之空間。臺灣高等法院100年度保險上易字第4號民事判決涉及之案件,即就相關問題為探討。本文即以此案例事實出發就前揭問題加以討論,藉以釐清相關之爭議。 |
英文摘要 | The beneficiary is the person who can request the insurer to pay the insurance money when the insurance accident occurs. The insurance contract for specifying the insurance beneficiary is much similar to the contract for the third party in Article 269 of Civil Code, however there is still difference between each other. The provision of the beneficiary is applicable to the life insurance, but is it also applicable to the property insurance? Article 5 of Insurance Act of the Republic of China provides the meaning of the word-"beneficiary", in addition Article 110 to 114 provide the method for determining beneficiaries. There is also the stipulation of the word-"beneficiary" in Article 45 and 52. However, can these two articles be the basis to confirm the definition of insurance beneficiary? There is room for discussion. The case for Taiwan High Court Civil Judgment Bao Sian Shan Yi No. 4 (2011) also discussed the problem of Article 45 & 52 of Insurance Act. So this article will discuss problem from this fact of the case and will have some suggestion. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。