查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 論公司章程管轄法院條款
- 董事法制的移植與衝突--兼論「外部董事免責」作為法制移植的策略
- The Effect of Forum-Selection Clauses in Maritime Contracts
- 公司自治:章程與辦事細則
- 融資併購對於目標公司債權人保護法制之研究
- 國際合意管轄之效果--從最高法院一○一年度臺抗字第二五九號裁定談起
- 美國控制股東「公平對待義務」之法制探源--兼論我國控制股東之濫權問題
- 從經濟觀點論企業風險管理與董事監督義務
- 未積極揭露利益衝突資訊與受託義務違反之刑事責任--論Skilling v. US案與美國誠信服務詐欺罪新發展之啟示
- 評我國強制設置薪酬委員會之立法政策--從經濟分析及美國金融改革法談起
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論公司章程管轄法院條款=Comment on Forum Provision in Corporate Charter |
---|---|
作者 | 黃朝琮; Huang, Chao-tsung; |
期刊 | 法令月刊 |
出版日期 | 20150100 |
卷期 | 66:1 2015.01[民104.01] |
頁次 | 頁73-92 |
分類號 | 587.2 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 章程管轄條款; 多重管轄訴訟; 受託義務; 合意管轄; 股東權益保護事項檢查表; Charter forum provision; Multi-jurisdictional litigation; Fiduciary duty; Forum-selection provision; Checklist for protecting shareholders of foreign issuers; |
中文摘要 | 公司章程中是否得以記載相關爭議的管轄法院?若可,應如何為之?國內文獻似未加以詳論。惟此並非僅為單純理論探討,而為我國證券交易所及有價證券櫃檯買賣中心於審核外國發行公司之上市上櫃申請時,要求外國發行公司於其章程中所應記載之事項。對此,晚近美國學說實務上恰因多重管轄訴訟之流弊,而對此等條款之效力,有所討論,而主導公司法重要發展的德拉瓦州法院,亦於2013年作成Boilermakers Local 154 v. Chevron判決,對此問題著有深刻分析。本文參考、介紹Chevron案及後續法院見解,以及相關美國學說討論,以解明章程管轄條款於美國法上的發展歷程,並就我國章程款項條款之效力,進行分析。 |
英文摘要 | While reviewing IPO applications by foreign issuers, Taiwan Stock Exchange and Taiwan Gretai Securities Market require the applicants to provide relevant provisions in the charter that allow the shareholders to sue in the future, which leads to several unanswered questions, such as whether such charter forum provision is enforceable and, if yes, to what extent should it be enforceable. Therefore, answers for those issues are not merely theoretical but for practical need for Taiwan capital market. However, those questions are not covered in current literatures. Due to the abuse of the corporate multi-jurisdictional litigation, issues related to charter forum provision are currently discussed and clarified by the U.S. courts and legal scholars. Especially, the Delaware Court of Chancery has rendered Boilermakers Local 154 v. Chevron in 2013 providing an inspiring analysis with respect to the enforceability of charter forum provision. This article comments on the Chevron opinion, the subsequent relevant court opinions and academic comments under U.S. law to reflect the development of those issues up to now. Based on those inspiring ideas, this article further, referring to relevant academic literatures, provides an analysis with respect to relevant issues surrounding charter forum provision, such as its validity, enforceability and standard of review. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。