查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Development and Psychometric Testing of the Group Identification Scale (Chinese Version)
- Professional Practice Environment Scale-Chinese Version: Development and Psychometric Testing
- 計劃行為理論各成份量表之設計、發展與建立--以青少年無照騎車行為之研究為例
- 手部外傷病患住院期間之急性創傷後反應--量表發展及現況
- 住院愛滋病患健康照護需求量表發展之前驅研究
- 資訊管理專業人員之專案團隊認同與其工作壓力及工作滿足之關係
- 我國服務業主管領導行為量表之發展:主位研究途徑的觀點
- 一個多元等待品質量表之發展
- 國人生活品質評量(1):SF-36臺灣版的發展及心理計量特質分析
- 「青少年感恩量表」之編製與驗證
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Development and Psychometric Testing of the Group Identification Scale (Chinese Version)=中文版團隊認同量表的發展與心理計量檢測 |
---|---|
作者 | 鄧景宜; 盧瑞芬; 趙銘崇; 許文馨; | 書刊名 | 明志學報 |
卷期 | 43:2 2014.10[民103.10] |
頁次 | 頁21-35 |
分類號 | 179 |
關鍵詞 | 團隊認同; 量表發展; 前譯; 回譯; 心理計量特質; Group identification; Scale development; Forward translation; Backward translation; Psychometric properties; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 多數的產業都重視團隊合作這項議題,其中,健康服務是一個重要的產業,也通常是由團隊所提供。對於團隊有強烈的認同感有助於提升團隊的效能,然而,目前仍缺乏一個發展較為完善的中文版團隊認同量表。基於Mayhew et al.(2010)的研究,本研究發展一個中文版的團隊認同量表,使用前譯與回譯過程來確認語意同等性,此外,也檢測中文版本的心理計量特性。研究一的參與者為229位大學生,研究二的參與者為290位北台灣一所醫學中心的白天班護理人員。中文版本也與原版本比較,分析結果發現本研究所發展之中文版本具有足夠的信度、收斂效度、以及區辨效度。因此,此中文版本量表是一個有足夠品質的量表,可協助諸多產業管理者評估其服務提供者的團隊認同的水準,也可以用來協助管理者調整其管理政策與強化管理效能。 |
英文摘要 | The issues of teamwork have recently come under the spotlight across a range of industries. Among them, health services comprise an important service sector, and such services are generally delivered by teams. A strong identification with the team can improve a team’s effectiveness. However, a Chinese version of a well-developed scale of group identification is lacking. This study develops a Chinese translation of a group identification scale, based on the Group Identification Scale of Mayhew, Gardner, and Ashkanasy (2010). Semantic equivalence is ensured using forward and backward translation. Additionally, the psychometric properties of the Chinese version are tested, based on survey data, which consists of 229 responses from college students in Study 1 and 290 responses from day-shift nurses in a northern Taiwan medical center in Study 2. Moreover, the Chinese version is compared with the scale of Mayhew et al. (2010). Analysis results indicate that the Chinese version exhibits sufficient reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity, thus offering a quality scale for the managers of many industries to assess the level of group identification among their service providers. The scale can also help managers to adjust management policy and enhance management efficiency. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。