頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論藥師販售處方箋用藥之釣魚=Discussion on Phishing Behaviors of Pharmacists on Prescription Drugs |
---|---|
作者 | 嚴奇均; | 書刊名 | 藥學雜誌 |
卷期 | 30:2=119 2014.06[民103.06] |
頁次 | 頁22-26 |
分類號 | 418.02 |
關鍵詞 | 社區藥師; 醫師處方之藥品; 釣魚偵查; 違法搜證; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 服務於社區藥局的藥師,在其執業生涯中,因違反行政機關相關規定而遭處以罰 鍰等行政罰者並不少見。但是,若藥師之違法行為係肇因於主管機關之挑唆 (即俗稱 釣魚),是否仍應受罰?此議題實值得進一步探討。 本文擬先舉案例事實供參,並將主管機關及其處罰法源臚列,再援引最常遭到釣 魚偵查的刑事案件及刑事法院對此議題的看法為例,並將嘗試解說行政罰與一般刑罰 如何區辯,最後再深入探討刑事法上的釣魚偵查理論是否得適用於行政罰,進一步推 演獲致主管機關用釣魚方式使藥師入罪之手段並不合法之結論,俾供往後執業藥師遭 遇此問題時答辯之依據。 |
英文摘要 | In their practicing career, many pharmacists in community pharmacy have been sentenced to fines or to other administrative penalties for violation of relevant provisions. The phenomena are common. However, if the pharmacists are instigated by competent authorities (or commonly known as "phishing"), should they still be punished? Such question deserves further discussion. The paper intended first to list some cases, as well as competent authorities and law source; second, the paper quoted some typical criminal cases incurred investigation and how Criminal Court viewed on these cases; also, the paper tried to interpret the differences between administrative penalty and general penalty; third, the paper discussed in-depth whether it is applicable to apply phishing investigation theory in criminal law on administrative penalty. Based on this, the paper deduced that it is illegal that competent authorities instigate pharmacists to misbehave. With this, proceeding defenses for pharmacists can be based when such situation occurs. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。