查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論我國普通法院法官之釋憲聲請權=The Petition Right for the Judges of the Ordinary Court to Interpret the Constitution |
---|---|
作者 | 張震; | 書刊名 | 社科法政論叢 |
卷期 | 1 2013.03[民102.03] |
頁次 | 頁1-37 |
分類號 | 581.24 |
關鍵詞 | 違憲審查; 釋憲聲請; 普通法院法官; 最高法院判例; 決議; Judicial review; Petition for judicial review; Judges of ordinary court; Supreme court cases; Resolution; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國違憲審查制度係採所謂「集中型」,亦即違憲審查權係專屬於司法院大法官,一般普通法院法官並無違憲審查權,然自大法官釋字第371號解釋後,確立普通法院法官有釋憲聲請權。本文乃以我國普通法院法官之釋憲聲請權為題,先介紹違憲審查制度之起源、發展及類型;繼而論述我國普通法院法官釋憲聲請權之演進、確立後,再進一步討論我國普通法院法官釋憲聲請權之客體,同時點出大法官目前就聲請釋憲客體為最高法院判例及決議之場合,係採限縮看法,申言之,即以最高法院判例及決議並非「法律」,故非普通法院法官得聲請釋憲之客體,則此項見解是否合理?有何缺失?爰以我國普通法院法官釋憲聲請權之界限,進一步論述最高法院判例及決議不得作為法官聲請釋憲客體在學理上值得商榷之處。最後呼籲大法官實有必要放寬我國普通法院法官聲請釋憲的範圍,而將最高法院之判例及決議列為法官得聲請釋憲之標的,以為結論。 |
英文摘要 | The Constitution shall be interpreted by the Grand Justices of the Judicial Yuan. With such centralized judicial review system in Taiwan, the power to interpret constitution wasn't provided to the judges of ordinary court; however, with No.371 of the J. Y. Interpretation, the petition for interpretation is given to the judges of ordinary court explicitly. The paper will center on the petition for judges of ordinary court to interpret the Constitution. The origin, development and types of the judicial review will be introduced first, and the progress and the given power of petition for the constitutional interpretation will be followed. Next, the object of the power will be analyzed, amid further discussion of the current ideas of the Grand Justice adopting a limited perspective toward the object of the petition for interpretation, regarding them as the occasion of the case and resolution of the Supreme Court. To be more specific, since the case and resolution of the Supreme Court is not ”law,” the object of the petition is not belonged to the judges of ordinary court. Is this perception correct, or is there any deficiency? With the limitation of the petition for the judges of ordinary court to interpret the Constitution, the fact that the case and resolution of the Supreme Court can not be regarded as the object of petition for judges to interpret the Constitution is worthy to be discussed academically. Urging the Grand Justice to loosen the registration of the petition for judges of ordinary court to interpret the Constitution and regard the case and resolution of the Supreme Court as the target for petition for judges will be the conclusion in this paper. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。