第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從海軍戰略角度分析我海軍應有之制海思維=The Current Strategy of the Navy should have Thought of the Command of the Sea |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 宋吉峰; | 書刊名 | 國防雜誌 |
卷期 | 26:6 2011.12[民100.12] |
頁次 | 頁22-36 |
分類號 | 592.42 |
關鍵詞 | 制海; 海上拒止; 交通線; 非傳統安全威脅; 刺蝟戰略; 海洋政策白皮書; 不對稱作戰; Command of the sea; Sea denial; Sea lines of communication; Non-traditional security threats; Porcupine strategy; Marine policy white paper; Asymmetric warfare; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 提 要 一、總結歷史啟示與現代實務,現代海洋國家為生存發展均強調:確保海上交通線的安全及確保海域主權與主權權利的完整。 二、劉華清定義中共的「海軍戰略」為區域防禦型戰略,主張中共海軍必須分三階段達成3個戰略目標:第一階段—在今後一個較長時期內,掌控第一島鏈與沿島嶼的外沿海區,以及島鏈以內的黃海、東海、南海海域;此區為中共領土主張、自然資源、及近岸防禦等重大國家利益水域。第二階段—掌控從太平洋北部至第二島鏈的東亞廣大海域,或至少達成拒止(denial)的目標;採積極防禦戰術、禦敵進我進思想。第三階段—成為全球性或至少是泛太平洋區域的海軍。 三、從世界地圖上可以看出,海上交通線的分佈與密度,是西方國家的一個必需品,對於他們有莫大的貢獻,但是反過來看,也足以顯示當敵方對這些海上交通線採取行動時,他們便會有極大的易毀性。就中華民國而言若能利用海洋,則可以增加力量和成功的機會,假若喪失了海洋,則對於中華民國即可能發生致命的危機。 四、海洋本身就是一個環節、一座橋樑、一條公路、一個中央位置,海軍能以適切的兵力加以控制。海軍提供了內線、中央位置以及軍事所需的交通線;但要加以確保就需擁有海外基地及堡壘等,在海軍作戰中艦隊本身佔有了關鍵的位置,而有利的位置即可增加制海的可行性。 五、自從有船隻以來,再強大的艦艇總是可被擊沈的,能夠擊沈艦隻的兵器種類很多—大砲、水雷、魚雷、炸彈、火箭、飛彈等。這些硬殺武器只不過是使船隻多了一種困難,我們應該設法去克服它,正好像對於其他威脅一樣。 六、火力、偵察、指揮與管制為海軍作戰三要素,亦可稱之為作戰手段。而耐波性差、續航力不足之輕快兵力無法滿足上述作戰手段,僅適於近岸防禦之用,並無取代大型戰艦之可能,除非放棄海洋國家之獨立國格。 |
英文摘要 | Abstract 1. Enlightenment and the practice of summing up historical and maritime nation for the survivaland development are emphasized: to ensure the safety of sea lines of communication and ensure the sovereignty and sovereign rights of waters intact. 2. Liu defined the Chinese Communists,“Naval Strategy"as a regional defensive strategy, the CPC advocated a three-stage Navy must achieve three strategic objectives: the first stage- a long period of time in the future, control of the first island chain and along the outer coast of the island area, and the island chain within the Yellow Sea, East China Sea, South China Sea; territorial claims in this area of the CPC, natural resources, and coastal defense and other vital national interests of the waters. Phase II-control of the northern Pacific to the second island chain from the East Asian vast sea, or at least reach (denial) of the goal; adopt active defense tactics against an enemy into thinking I entered. Phase III-a global or at least the Pan-Pacific Navy. 3. It can be seen from the world map, the distribution and density of sea lines of communication is a necessity in Western countries, for their great contribution, but conversely, is enough to show when the enemy sea lines of communication to take these actions, They will have great perishable nature. If use of the oceans, you can increase the strength and success of the opportunity, if loss of the sea, the subjugation of our country that is the danger that may occur. 4. Ocean itself is a link, a bridge, a highway, a central location, the Navy can be controlled with appropriate force. Navy provides the inside, the central position and military lines of communication required; but be sure to be a bastion of overseas bases and so on, in the naval fleet of the war itself occupies a critical position, and position to the sea to increase the system Feasibility. 5. Since a vessel since then always be a powerful ships sunk, to sink the ships of many types of weapons - guns, mines, torpedoes, bombs, rockets, missiles and so on. These hard-kill weapons is to make the vessel more than just a difficult, we should try to overcome it, is the same as for other threats. 6. Firepower, reconnaissance, command and control operations for the three elements of the Navy, also known as means of warfare. The seakeeping poor, lack of light and life force can not meet the operational means, for coastal defense purposes only, not to replace the possible large warships, except to give up an independent national character of maritime countries. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。