查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國家安全與人權保障--以美國反恐法制為中心
- 九一一事件後美國移民政策初探
- 建立嶄新軍事審判制度以貫徹審判獨立及人權保障說帖
- 論反恐怖主義行動法制與人權保障
- 多少罪惡假「國家安全」之名而行?--簡介美國反恐措施對人權之侵蝕
- 當前美國國家安全與秘密資訊維護政策之探討
- 集會遊行許可與否之行政判斷
- 從國家安全與人權保障觀點探討大陸人士來臺投資法制的現況、困境與對策
- 書評:Sudha Setty (蘇哈.賽迪), «National Security Secrecy: Comparative Effects on Democracy and the Rule of Law» (國家安全機密--民主與法治的比較效應) (Cambridge University Press, 2017)
- 從國家安全之風險角度論軍事審判之必要性
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國家安全與人權保障--以美國反恐法制為中心=National Security and the Protection of Human Right Anti-terrorism Legislation in the United States of America |
---|---|
作 者 | 李麒; | 書刊名 | 東吳法律學報 |
卷 期 | 22:3 2011.01[民100.01] |
頁 次 | 頁1-49 |
分類號 | 587.71 |
關鍵詞 | 國家安全; 人權保障; 反恐法制; 國際恐怖主義; 不確定法律概念; 司法院大法官解釋; 愛國者法; 九一一恐怖攻擊事件; 軍事審判; 決策程序; National security; The protection of human right; The legal system of anti-terrorism; International terrorism; Indefinite concept of law; The Judicial Yuan interpretation; The patriot act; 911 terrorist attack; Military tribunal; The decision-making processes; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 當國家面臨戰爭或恐怖攻擊等危機時,國家安全常成為政府採取緊急措施之理由,即使在和平時期國家安全亦常以各種不同理由,為法律、命令及司法院大法官解釋所援用,國家安全本身為不確定法律概念,即使無法明確定義,至少可以探求其射程範圍與決策程序,因為在民主法治國家,即使國家安全非常重要,也應該遵守法律保留原則,不容許成為一人決策或少數人決定之獨裁政治,所以國會監督程序就非常重要。 本文首先討論國家安全定義、範圍與決定程序,其次以比較法觀點,就美國911事件後以「國家安全」為名從事反恐戰爭,實施愛國者法、以軍事法庭審判美國公民等違反人權事項加以探討。 |
英文摘要 | When a nation faces the threat of war, terrorist attacks or other similar crisis, ”national security” is often used by governments as an excuse to justify for emergency legislation. Even in peaceful time, the term of ”national security” can often be found in laws, regulations and judicial interpretation. Although national security has no fixed meaning by itself, we still can search for the range of this term and the decision-making process for national security purpose. In a democratic country, despite the importance of national security, government decisions are still subject to the principle of legal reservation. Such decisions cannot be made by a single person or a small group of people. Therefore, the oversight of congress on government decisions is vital. Base on the above ideas, this paper deals with the definition, scope and decision-making processes of national security. Then, discussing how the United States uses ”national security” as a tool in the so-called ”war against terrorism” after 911 terrorist attacks from the view of comparative law perspective. The enforcement of the Patriot Act and the trial of American citizens in military tribunals are also discussed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。