查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 超驗主體間性的構成及其超驗主體間意識共同化的構成認識--從胡塞爾的「發生」現象學來看
- Transcendental Genesis and Ontological Genesis--E. Husserl's Genetic Phenomenology and M. Heidegger's Hermeneutic Phenomenology
- 埃利亞斯與胡塞爾--“過程社會學”與“發生現象學”的隱秘關聯
- 創傷的記憶或遺忘?--一個時間現象學的探討
- 胡塞爾的現象學及其在教育上的蘊含
- 現象學創建者胡塞爾的哲學思想
- 胡塞爾「歐洲科學危機與超驗現象學」一書中的歷史觀之探討--試以「生活世界」(Life-world)作為解釋線索
- 胡塞爾[E. Husserl]之「生命世界(Life-World)」問題初探
- 列夫.舍斯托夫的宗教哲學
- 從胡塞爾之邏輯的現象學來看卡納普之「世界的邏輯構造」
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 超驗主體間性的構成及其超驗主體間意識共同化的構成認識--從胡塞爾的「發生」現象學來看=The Constitution of Transcendental Intersubjectivity and Its Constitutive Knowing of Transcendental Intersubjective Communa1ization of Consciousness: A Consideration from Husserl's "Genetic" Phenomenology |
---|---|
作 者 | 江偉峰; | 書刊名 | 東吳哲學學報 |
卷期 | 22 2010.08[民99.08] |
頁次 | 頁47-82 |
分類號 | 147.71 |
關鍵詞 | 胡塞爾; 發生現象學; 超驗主體間性; 越驗主體間共同化; 超驗同感作用; Husserl; Genetic phenomenology; Transcendental intersubjectivity; Transcendental intersubjective communalization; Transcendental empathy; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 摘 要 本文嘗試就胡塞爾「發生」現象學的方法觀點,再次檢視超驗現象學 是否可能陷落於一種無法建立知識普遍客觀性之「獨我論」的危險困境。因 此主要的任務,無非即是就「被動發生」與「主動發生」的兩個意識層次, 深入探討作為發生構成「超驗主體間性(超驗他者/他我)」及其「超驗主 體間意識共同化的認識」之「超驗同感作用」,如何可能此一根本問題。而 在對於「超驗同感作用」如何可能此一根本問題所進行之深入探討的整個 過程中,我們則將首先探明「超驗同感作用」所預設之先行發生的諸動機 條件;其次探明意識潛在背景中作為「被動類比統覺」(「被動附現」)之 「被動同感作用」;再其次則探明意識前景中作為「主動類比統覺」(「主 動附現」)之「主動同感作用」。此外,我們也將更進而理解,「超驗同感 作用」究竟可在「多低限度」的意識預設條件下運作發生;並指出「超驗同 感作用」之諸意識預設條件的運作過程,是否僅限於對「自我與其他的身體 形體」的「視覺構成意識」這樣一種發展取向。最後,我們則將嘗試解明, 「超驗同感作用」究竟如何可能「有真實根據地」發生構成「超驗主體間性 (超驗他者/他我)」及其「超驗主體間意識共同化的認識」。 |
英文摘要 | Abstract Based on the methodological view of Husserl’s “genetic” phenomenology this paper attempts to re-examine whether transcendental phenomenology might be mired in the dangerous predicament of a kind of “Solipsismus” which makes it impossible to establish the universal objectivity of knowledge. Hence our main task here is to probe deeply, in terms of two conscious levels of “passive genesis” and “active genesis”, into this fundamental question: how is “transcendental empathy” possible which genetically constitutes “transcendental intersubjectivity (transcendental Other/other I)” and “transcendental intersubjectively conscious communalized knowing”. And in the whole process of probing deeply into this fundamental question of how possible “transcendental empathy” is, we will investigate first, the antecedent motivational conditions presupposed by “transcendental empathy”; secondly, “passive empathy” as “passive analogous apperception” (passive appresentation) in the underlying background of consciousness; and thirdly, “active empathy” as “active analogous apperception” (active appresentation) in the foreground of consciousness. Moreover, we will also go further to find out “how low the limits” of the conditions presupposed by consciousness could be under which “transcendental empathy” can occur and operate; and point out whether the conditions presupporsed by consciousness in the operating process of “transcendental empathy” are restricted to this developmental aspect of “visional constitutive consciousness” of “my bodily shape and other bodilyshape”. Finally, we will try to make clear how “transcendental empathy” is possible “with real grounds”, to genetically constitute “transcendental intersubjectivity (transcendental Other/other I)” and “transcendental intersubjectively conscious communalized knowing”. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。