查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 學校衛生工作模式與青少年健康之研究
- 國中生幽默感對於生活壓力、身心健康之調節作用
- Factors Attributing to the Psychological Recovery from the 1999 Taiwan Earthquake among Junior High School Students: A Focus Group Interview Study
- 國中學生之健康行為研究
- 從健康教育的觀點對國中生吸食安非他命(Amphetamine) 之探討
- 臺北市國中生體型意識滿意度與健康知識、健康行為相關性之研究
- 基層衛生人員之健康體能師資培訓模式及活動推展情形之評估研究
- 高中聯考壓力與國中生身心健康之研究
- 國中學生善終概念之研究--以臺北縣某國中學生為例
- 國中生口腔保健成效研究--以健康促進學校六大範疇為推動策略
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 學校衛生工作模式與青少年健康之研究=A Study between School Health Model and Health among Junior High School Students in Southern Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 姜逸群; 黃雅文; 胡益進; 黃春太; 林怡杉; 謝嘉珍; | 書刊名 | 學校衛生 |
卷 期 | 54 2009.06[民98.06] |
頁 次 | 頁91-105 |
分類號 | 523.5779 |
關鍵詞 | 健康; 國中生; 學校衛生工作模式; Health; Junior high school students; School health work model; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese);中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究目的在探討國中生的學校聯結與健康之現況,以及比較不同學校衛生工作模式下兩者之異同。以南部七縣市公立學校國中生為研究母群體,採機率比率抽樣方式,利用結構式問卷進行資料收集,共得有效問卷4216份,有效回收率98.5%,其重要結果如下:一、國中生與學校聯結來看,以學校承諾最好,學校涉入次之,歸屬感再次之,以學校信念最差。二、國中生在落實健康促進行為上,整體而言相當良好,其中以安全行為最佳,營養行為次之,運動行為表現最差。三、國中生的幸福感在中等程度。四、健康促進學校與傳統衛生計畫學校比較時,在學校聯結上,健康促進學校優於傳統衛生計畫學校,但其差異主要是在學生對學校承諾上,而在歸屬感、師生關係、學校涉入和學校信念上則無顯著差異;在健康促進行為上,健康促進學校只有在安全行為上優於傳統衛生計畫學校,在營養行為、運動行為、壓力管理行為、健康責任行為則沒有顯著差異。五、幸福感方面,健康促進學校與傳統學校衛生計畫則無顯著差異。研究者針對研究結果加以討論,並且提出建議以供未來研究與實務應用上之參考。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to investigate the school connectedness and health of junior high school students, and to further examine differences in two models of school health work. The students of junior high schools at 7 counties and cities in Southern Taiwan were the target population of the study, and the samples were selected by using probability proportionate to size sampling method. The data collection was based on structural questionnaire method, and there were 426 valid samples, which presented a 98.5% of valid response rate. The main results of the study are summarized as follows: 1. As far as the connectedness with junior high school students and schools, were concerned the best was school commitment, the second was school involvement, the third was belonging, and the worst was school belief. 2. The health promoting behaviors of junior high school students were good as the whole. Among the health promoting behaviors, the best was safety behavior, the second was nutrition behavior, and the worst was exercise behavior. 3. The wellbeing of junior high school students was mediuml. 4. The comparison of health promoting schools and traditional health program schools, health promoting schools were better than traditional health program schools in school connectedness, but the difference mainly to school commitment in students. There were no significant difference in belonging, teacher-student relationship, school involvement and school belief. On the health promoting behavior, the health promoting schools were only superior to traditional health program schools on the safety behavior. There were no significant difference in nutrition behavior, exercise behavior, stress management behavior, health responsibility behavior. 5. In wellbeing, health promotion schools and traditional health program schools were no significant difference. The results of the study and applications of the program were discussed and the recommendations for future research were proposed. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。