查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 縣市長選舉政見的實證分析:苗栗縣個案分析
- Determinants of Voting Behavior: An Analysis of the 1997 County Magistrate and City Mayoral Elections in Taiwan
- 精省後我國縣市長任免權之研究--以新竹縣市為例:地方首長人事權,應兼顧文官體制之政治性與穩定性
- 「各界對本屆超世紀縣市長大選結果的看法」座談會之會議記錄
- 苗栗縣客家採茶戲初探--從藝人、劇團及戲劇內容探討之
- 八十六年縣市長候選人體育運動政見之探討
- 苗栗縣傳統建築研究(2)--銅鑼鄉的民宅、寺廟建築
- 栗社留下歷史的詩篇
- 縣市長與政治菁英的流動模式
- 苗栗縣推展書香滿校園計畫
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 縣市長選舉政見的實證分析:苗栗縣個案分析=An Empirical Analysis of the Political Platforms in County Magistrate Elections in Taiwan:A Case Study of the Miaoli County |
---|---|
作者 | 黃國敏; Hwang, Edward; |
期刊 | 香港社會科學學報 |
出版日期 | 20090900、20091200 |
卷期 | 37 2009.秋-冬[民98.秋-冬] |
頁次 | 頁101-130 |
分類號 | 575.193 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 地方首長; 政見承諾; 苗栗縣; 縣市長; 優先政見; Candidates' policy programmes; County magistrates; Miaoli County; Political platforms; |
中文摘要 | 地方政府預算最主要的決策者為地方首長,其次是行政官僚的各機關首長與財政機關首長,再其次才是議會;在預算考量因素上,地方首長的競選政見與法定辦理事項是最為重要的兩點原因。因此本文檢驗歷屆苗栗縣長當選人所提出的重要的優先政見,查看有沒有執行並比較他們的競選政見與財政支出決算,以檢驗其政見承諾是否兌現?本研究發現歷屆苗栗縣長當選人所提重要的優先政見,若屬於較具體的政見,如補助社區巡守隊裝備,達標的機率相對較高,而屬於原則性的政見其被達標的機率相對較低,主要原因是民眾對具體的政見較容易檢視,兌現與否無從抵賴,執政的縣長為了避免被攻擊因而努力兌現競選承諾;至於那些原則性的政見因內容較為模糊,民眾難以檢驗成果,縣長就有意無意間把它們忽略了。所以基於民主政治下,統治者向被治者負責的基本原則,未來應嚴格要求候選人在選舉公報上提出具體的政見訴求,於當選後民眾才有檢驗其選舉承諾是否兌現,以作為未來支持與否的依據。 |
英文摘要 | The most important decision-makers regarding the budgets of local governments in Taiwan are the county magistrates, followed by the heads of the administrative departments and then the local legislators. Hence the campaign platforms of county magistrate candidates and the processes and practices prescribed by the law are the most important factors affecting the budgets of local governments. This article intends to examine whether the priority policy programmes of the Miaoli county magistrates since 1993 have been implemented as reflected by each year’s accounts. It finds that if the priority policy programmes are well defined, the probabilities of their respective implementation are higher; and if they are defined in principle only, the probabilities of their implementation are correspondingly lower because they are hard to be inspected by the citizens. As “the rulers are responsible to the ruled” is the basic law for a democracy, this article suggests that the candidates should be bound by law to provide the definite policy programmes in the election gazettes. Hence citizens can better make their judgments in casting their ballots based on the candidates’ concrete policy programmes. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。