查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 日本獨占禁止法的域外適用--以近年國際聯合行為案例為題材=The Extraterritorial Application of Japan's Anti-Monopoly Act--Taking Recent International Cartel Cases as Core Subject |
---|---|
作 者 | 岡本直貴; | 書刊名 | 臺灣國際法季刊 |
卷 期 | 6:4 2009.12[民98.12] |
頁 次 | 頁85-101 |
專 輯 | 國際經濟法 |
分類號 | 585.8 |
關鍵詞 | 國際聯合壟斷行為; 獨占禁止法; 特定交易領域; 日本公正取引委員會; 效果理論; 實施理論; International cartel; Anti-monopoly act; Areas of particular transaction; The fair trade commission of Japan; Effect theory; Practice theory; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 由於外國企業在日本以外實施的聯合壟斷行爲,對日本市場造成重大影響的案例日益增加,使得日本公正取引委員會開始積極採取法律措施以茲應對。比較新的著名案例包括國內外人造石墨電極生產商實施的價格聯合壟斷案,以及維生素生產銷售商實施的生產數量聯合行爲案。兩案都是以違反獨占禁止法第三條和第六條,而對日本國內業者發出警告。近年來,開始出現對在日本以外實施聯合壟斷行爲的外國企業,不適用獨占禁止法第六條,而是適用禁止「不當交易限制」的獨占禁止法第三條,並命其繳納課徵金的案例。本文以最近的國際聯合壟斷事件爲中心,闡述日本獨占禁止法域外適用的現狀,以及論述最近事件的法律問題點。 |
英文摘要 | The recent cartel cases among foreign businesses outside Japanese territory have seriously impacted Japanese market, leading the Japanese Fair Trade Commission to take aggressive legal measures to deal with this situation. Two of latest cartel cases were the price monopoly by the artificial graphite electrode manufacturers and the quantity monopoly by vitamin manufacturers and venders. These two cases have violated Articles 3 and 6 of the Anti-monopoly Act in Japan, for which the offending businesses have received the warning from the authorities concerned. However, over recent years, there have been cartel among foreign businesses outside Japanese territory, to which Article 6 of the Anti-monopoly Act is not applicable, while Article 3 governing improper transactions should apply. Under Article 3 of Antimonopoly Act, violators are subject to fines. Based on the recent international cartel cases, this article elaborated on the current status of the extraterritorial application of Japan's Anti-monopoly Act and discussed the legal issues over recent cases. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。