查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 毒品危害防制條例修法前後相關性之比較=The Research for the Outcome in Implementing the Regulation of Preventing Drug Abuse Before and After |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳瑞珠; 蔡采蕙; 許正弦; | 書刊名 | 中州學報 |
卷 期 | 19 2004.06[民93.06] |
頁 次 | 頁249-266 |
分類號 | 585.38 |
關鍵詞 | 毒品危害防制條例; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「毒品危害防制條例」於民國八十七年五月修正公布,與先前「肅清煙毒條例」相較有很大幅度的改變,最大差異在於對毒品施用者除了當成「犯人」之外,亦將施用者視為「病人」,對於毒品施用者之處置不再僅處以徒刑,進而以「觀察勒戒」及「強制戒治」取代之,科刑的刑度上亦降低許多,本文將使用「一審法院」之資料,對於修法前後案件量及被告人數進行比較,計算月份之平均數及變異數,透過統計假設檢定之分析,進而瞭解因施用毒品而受科刑之人數是否有明顯的改變,依據資料實證結果顯示,因施用毒品受科刑之人數確有明顯的降低。同時文中亦針對各地區施用毒品受科刑人數佔總人口的比率與目前戒癮醫療機構設置及分怖情況進行探討,從資料比較之結果發現,施用毒品人口比率較高之地區,戒癮醫療機構的家數並未較多,顯示戒癮醫療機構資源分配並不平均。 |
英文摘要 | The regulation for preventing drug abuse that amended in May, 1998, had a great range of changes compared to the regulation on eliminating drugs. The major discrepancy was that drug addicts were regarded as not only "the prisoners", but also "the patients". The penalties to those drug addicts were not sentenced to imprisonment only. In addition, they were sentenced for an observation and a compulsory prohibiting from intakes. Thus, it reduced a great deal of the punishment in prison. This paper uses the cases of previous and amended law, and the number of defendants in the primary court to conduct a comparison, calculating the mean and variation in months. Through the analysis of statistical hypothesis testing, we can conclude whether there is significant difference in drug use and the number of the offenders. According to the findings, the number of prisoner of drug addicts did decline. Furthermore, in the paper, we also test the percentage of sentenced drug addicts in the population according to the region and the scatter areas of medical treatment institute. Using the data, the results interpret that the areas of the higher rates of drug user has no significant difference with in along with more medical treatment center. It reveals that the distribution of medical treatment resource is not equal. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。