頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 性別主流化:反思家庭暴力與社會工作教育=Gender Mainstreaming: Reflection on Domestic Violence and Social Work Education |
---|---|
作 者 | 廖美蓮; | 書刊名 | 靜宜人文社會學報 |
卷 期 | 6:1 2012.01[民101.01] |
頁 次 | 頁177-225 |
分類號 | 544.7 |
關鍵詞 | 性別主流化; 家庭暴力; 消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約; 性別意識; 社工教育; Gender mainstreaming; Domestic violence; CEDAW; Gender-consciousness; Social work education; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 暴力,是對婦女的偏見和歧視中最極端的一種表現。性暴力行為更反映出男性讓暴力支配女性的主要機制。隨著婦女運動的潮流推演,與政府推動「性別主流化」納入決策依據一段時間後,本研究旨在探討政府推動性別主流化政策在家庭暴力防治工作中的執行概況,並檢視社工性別培力的成效,以及社會工作教育走向性別敏感與性別覺醒的反思。本文截取自作者2009國科會年補助《性別主流化:家庭暴力與社會工作教育的反思》研究計劃中,以實務工作者為主的三次焦點團體資料分析,透過「性別主流化」與「消除對婦女一切形式歧視公約」的概念,期待從實務工作者的觀點,反省並找出提昇具性別意識社工教育的重要要素。因此,根據焦點團體的討論,萃取出成員認為性別主流化在家暴系統內的成效:(一)流於形式、過程生硬(二)定義模糊、執行困難(三)對概念充滿誤解、更形篳路藍縷(四)缺乏具體指標及評估標準(五)上位者不瞭解性別議題、為執行而執行(六)性別培力由上而下、由下而上的雙軌論述。同時提出性別主流化與家暴做結合在臺灣遇到的挑戰:(一)以性別主流化檢視家庭暴力防治工作的障礙(二)社工職場性別意識與生活性別實踐之間出現斷裂(三)與男性工作衝撞中的反思。研究者總括社工教育在性別培力所面臨的困難:(一)找不到師資的難題(二)社會工作教育與性別培力的反思:第一性別意識課程設立的必要性,其次是性別意識課程內容缺乏結合生命經驗體察,第三師資的性別意識是性別教育是關鍵角色。最後,研究者強調,在性別光譜上除男女這兩種主流的性別以外,尚有更多獨特的性別,她/他們的需要如何才能不被排除在體制外?如何在多元社會關係脈絡中降低社會區隔、階級分化與性別差異處境,恐怕是接下來不可迴避的重要議題。 |
英文摘要 | Violence against women is the most extreme practice, for the purpose of prejudicing and oppressing. Gender-based violence is a major human right problem and stands for the inequality between two sexes throughout the world. Due to the developing trend of feminist movement, the international women’s organizations have developed the concept of “Gender mainstreaming”, in order to fight for the interests and rights of all genders. The Executive Yuan of Taiwan have launched “Ministerial Gender Mainstreaming implementation programme” for years. This study is to explore the process of assessing the implications for government to promote gender perspectives into all policies and examine the effectiveness of gender equality education and training, as well as gender-sensitive curricula in social work education. This paper is the result of the National Science Council research granted project on "Gender mainstreaming: rethinking domestic violence and social work education" in 2009. Focus group interviews are a method for collecting qualitative data. Three of the focus groups were conducted. The findings of the effectiveness of gender mainstreaming applied into the domestic violence system are as follows: (a) it is over-emphasis on the formality (b) it is vaguely defined, difficult to implement (c) the concept is full of misunderstandings, makes the implementation even harder (d) there are lack of specific indicators and evaluation criteria (e) the hierarchy is lack of gender-sensitivity (f) Gender equality and empowerment is a bottom-up process that can be also formulated from top-down. While there is increased understanding, the challenges of incorporating gender perspectives into domestic violence practice are found: (a) gender-biased institutional norms, which are embedded in the hierarchies, work practices and beliefs of organizations and constrain efforts to implement gender mainstreaming, often operate below the level of awareness. (b) views on gender-based segmentation in the workplace and in interpersonal relationships have often undergone profound changes as a result of feminist and/or economic influences, result in considerable differences in gender roles in almost all societies. (c) reflection on the impact of working with men; and the last but not the least challenge is (d) the author concluded the difficulties in gender education training for social workers, such as (i) lack of teachers with gender background (ii) the reflection on social work education and gender-based training. Finally, the researcher stressed that gender is a spectrum; there is a range of gender identities between and outside of the categories of male and female. Therefore, the voices of different genders have to be heard and the priorities and needs expressed have to be taken into consideration. Consultation with women as well as men was essential for successful gender mainstreaming. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。