查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | CIPP評鑑模式的概念與發展=The Concept and Development of the Cambridge International Primary Programme (CIPP) Evaluation Model |
---|---|
作者 | 王全興; Wang, Chuan-hsing; |
期刊 | 慈濟大學教育研究學刊 |
出版日期 | 20090700 |
卷期 | 5 2009.07[民98.07] |
頁次 | 頁1-27 |
分類號 | 526.75 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 評鑑; 評鑑模式; CIPP評鑑模式; Evaluation; Evaluation model; CIPP evaluation model; |
中文摘要 | Stufflebeam自提出CIPP模式後,一直不斷地發表一些修改或補充性的文章,在應用實務土值得我們持續的關切;同時籍由Stufflebeam評鑑模式發展的歷程,可以協助我們對評鑑模式更深層的認知。本文僅對Stufflebeam在CIPP評鑑模式中四額評鑑的細部內涵,自其1971年專書陳述CIPP模式之後,後於1985年對CIPP評鑑模式進行相關修正,其後在2000年又提出較完整的補充與詮釋,最後2003年又修正了一些方法、技術及補充說明的圖表,進行內涵「異同」與「增減」的深入探討,以期完備的理解整個CIPP模式的概念與發展歷程。 |
英文摘要 | Since Stufflebeam submitted a Cambridge International Primary Programme (CIPP) model, some revised or supplementary articles presented up till today have made contributions to our practical work, and elicited new concerns. At the same time, Stufflebeam’s evaluation model development in the process has enabled us to attain greater recognition within this field. This study is based on Stufflebeam’s claim in the CIPP evaluation model, with four types of evaluative detailed content. He made relevant modifications to the CIPP evaluation model in 1985, after his book on the CIPP model was published in 1971. In 2000, he again offered a rather thorough complement and interpretation. In addition, he made another amendment in some perspectives, technology, and additional charts, in 2003, and presented a number of discussions on differences and adjustments of contexts to a more far-reaching level, with the expectation of comprehending the entire CIPP model concept and its developmental history. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。