第1筆 /總和 1 筆
/ 1 筆
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 中國當代詩史的後現代論述=Postmodern Discussion on History of Contemporary Poetry in Mainland China |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳大為; | 書刊名 | 國文學報 |
卷 期 | 43 2008.06[民97.06] |
頁 次 | 頁177-198 |
關鍵詞 | 當代詩史; 第三代詩史; 後現代論述; History of contemporary poetry; History of third generation poetry; Postmodern discussion; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 後現代主義從一九八○年代中期開始,成為中國大陸學界的顯學,對先鋒文學創作的影響十分深遠。《中國當代詩歌史》(洪子誠、劉登翰合著)和《中國當代新詩史》(程光煒著)等重要詩史專著,在詩史的發展與分期上,卻以詩歌群落和思潮流派作為分期與討論的角度,並沒有正式探討或突顯第三代詩人的創作文本,及其詩歌理念和言談當中所蘊含的後現代特質,儘管它是未成熟的後現代實驗。本文擬透過上述兩部中國當代詩歌史專著和其他相關的文學史專著,針對一九八○年代中期以降,後現代主義的接受與論述,進行專題討論。 |
英文摘要 | Post Modernism had become the famous school of Mainland China’s educational circles since mid 1980’s, and it has great influence towards the creativity of avant-garde literature. Within the development and stages in history of poetry, the books of History of contemporary poetry in Mainland China (author: Hong Zi Cheng & Liu Deng Han), History of contemporary modern poetry in Mainland China (author: Cheng Guang Wei) and other important monographs that implemented community of poetry and genre of thought as viewpoints for stages & discussion, do not probing into texts created by third generation poet, and neither were they giving prominence to the theory of poetry and postmodern characteristic contained in way one speaks, despite the latter is an immature postmodern experiment. Based on the acceptance & discussion of postmodernism after mid 1980’s, this article will perform panel discussion via two monographs related to history of contemporary poetry in Mainland China and other monographs related to history of literature. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。