頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Admiration of China and Classical Chinese Thought in the Radical Enlightenment (1685-1740)=歐洲激進啟蒙時期(1685-1740)對中國經典及思想之讚賞 |
---|---|
作者 | Israel, Jonathan I.; Israel, Jonathan I.; | 書刊名 | 臺灣東亞文明研究學刊 |
卷期 | 4:1 2007.06[民96.06] |
頁次 | 頁1-25 |
專輯 | 『中國性與歐洲性』專號 |
分類號 | 113 |
關鍵詞 | 中國經典哲學; 儒學; 物活論; 自然神學; 教皇體制; 斯賓諾莎主義; 激進啟蒙運動; Classical Chinese philosophy; Confucianism; Hylozoism; Natural theology; Papacy; Spinozism; Radical Enlightenment; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | The European controversy over how to interpret Chinese Confucianist thought, during the early eighteenth century left the Radical Enlightenment's conception of Confucianism as essentially atheistic, materialist and as resembling Spinozism, in a generally rather strong position. This was partly because the subversive argument put forward by writers like Isaac Vossius, William Temple, Saint-Evremond, Pierre Bayle, Anthony Collins and Nicolas Freret was, in effect, supported by one wing of the moderate mainstream Enlightenment, most notably by Arnauld, Malebranche, and La Croze, who arrived at broadly the same conclusion out of opposite motives, wanting thereby to damage the reputation of classical Chinese thought (and also that of the Jesuits). The opposing view upheld by the Jesuits and Leibniz, according to which classical Chinese philosophy embraces "natural theology" and a providential God, did not prosper so well as it came to be opposed by the Papacy and condemned by the Sorbonne. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。