查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 論著作權人對間接妨害人之不作為請求權--從德國之妨害人責任理論出發=The Claims against Indirect Interferer to Prevent Copyright Infringement--A Focus of the "Störerhaftung" Theory in German Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 林昱梅; | 書刊名 | 興大法學 |
卷 期 | 2 2007.11[民96.11] |
頁 次 | 頁137-213 |
分類號 | 588.34 |
關鍵詞 | 著作權; 著作權侵害; 侵害排除; 侵害防止; 間接妨害人; 間接責任; 點對點傳輸; Copyright; Copyright infringement; Removal of infringement; Prevention of infringement; Indirect interferer; Secondary liability; P2P; Peer to peer; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 我國著作權法第八十四條規定:「著作權人或製版權人對於侵害其權利者,得請求排除之,有侵害之虞者,得請求防止之。」該條之侵害排除及防止請求權,與民法第七六七條物上請求權類似,且不以故意或過失為要件。本文就著作權人基於該條之不作為請求權,透過德國以民法第一○○四條所有人物上請求權所發展出之妨害人責任(Störerhaftung)予以分析,認為德國判決所列妨害人責任之成立要件、期待可能性之監督與防止侵權義務、中性妨害人與積極妨害人之區分,憲法基本權利之衡量等,可供我國參考。 |
英文摘要 | Article 84 of the Taiwan Copyright Act reads as follows: The copyright holder or the plate rights holder may demand the infringer to remove copyright infringement. Where there is a substantial likelihood of infringement, the copyright holder or the plate rights holder may demand the infringer to prevent infringement from occurring. This provision is similar to Article 767 of the Taiwan Civil Code. No intent or negligence on the side of the infringer is required to exercise the right to demand these measures. This article analyzes the claims against indirect interferer for reasonable measures to remove and prevent copyright infringement by exploring the theory of „Störerhaftung“ in German court decisions, including the re-quirements of claims, the obligation to supervise and prevent infringement based on the theory of „Zumutbarkeit“, the distinction of neutral and active interferer, and the considerations of constitutional basic rights. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。