頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 高中體育教科書之編輯現況:編輯者的觀點=Compilation for Physical Education Textbooks (PETs) of Senior High Schools: Viewpoints of Editors |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉兆達; 鄭秀貴; | 書刊名 | 臺灣運動教育學報 |
卷 期 | 8:2 2013.11[民102.11] |
頁 次 | 頁51-69 |
分類號 | 523.74993 |
關鍵詞 | 課程改革; 課程研發; 體育教學; Curriculum revolution; Physical education curriculum; Certification; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 目的:探討高中體育教科書之編輯團隊、編輯考量因素、編輯過程及所面臨問題或困難,方法:訪談法及文件分析法,工具為半結構式訪談大綱,訪談對象為五位高中體育教科書編輯人員,文件分析資料為審定通過之第一、二冊高中體育教科書,訪談資料進行開放性編碼,並與文件分析資料進行分析及比較。結果:(一)高中體育教科書作者團隊,以兼職大學教師及國高中教師為主;(二)體育教科書編輯考量因素,以實務教學考量為優先;(三)體育教科書發展過程,包括:組織編輯委員會、課程規劃、編輯及討論、審查及選用階段。(四)體育教科書編輯過程中,面臨到下列問題,包括:審查委員主導教科書編寫、隱藏的審查標準、教材內容過多且難度高等。結論:(一)高中體育教科書作者團隊,並未聘任專職課程研發人員;(二)體育教科書編輯考量因素,以各校具備場地及設備為優先考量;(三)體育教科書發展過程,缺少教科書研發、實驗、試用及評鑑等階段;(四)體育教科書編輯過程所面臨問題,主要與教科書審查相關。建議政府部門應補助教科書研發經費或獎勵教科書研發工作。此外,應設置第三仲裁機構,解決教科書編輯及審查之爭議。 |
英文摘要 | Purposes of this study were to explore editing team, considering factors, phases, and questions for editing physical education textbooks (PETs) of senior high schools in Taiwan. The methods were the semi-structured interview and documentary analysis, and the instrument was outlines used to collect those data. The subjects were 5 editors of non-government publishers and 5 editions for PETs certificated by National Academy for Educational Research (NAER). Those data were arranged and summarized by opening coding, and analyzed. Results were as in the follows: a) Members of the editing team for editing PETs were teachers to instruct physical education in senior high schools and universities. b) Considering factors for editing PETs were those to use in real teaching situation such as places, equipment, and facilities. c) The phases for editing PETs were composing an editing team, planning, editing and discussion, certificating and selecting textbooks. d) Questions for editing PETs were those such as guiding editing textbooks by certificating members, invisible certificating standards, and teaching materials to much. In conclusion, the team for editing PETs was lack full time persons for creating subject matters. Furthermore, considering factors for editing PETs were needed the places and equipment firstly. In addition, it lacked phases for editing PETs as creating and innovation, experimental, sampling, and evaluation. Most questions for editing PETs were those with certificating textbooks. It advised that the government needed to reward publishers to creating subject matters of PETs, and to build an organization to solving problems for editing and certificating textbooks. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。