查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Enhancing the Sensitivity of the Stroop Test in Detecting Executive Function Using a New Computation of the Interference Score
- 男大專生身體適能與認知功能之關聯
- Cognitive and Motor Components of Response Speed in the Stroop Test in Parkinson's Disease Patients
- 證券交易法第一五七條短線交易歸入權之研究
- 20世紀尾牙論空調負荷計算方法研究史及其CAD程序發展
- 綠色國民所得帳研討會--永續經濟福利指標(ISEW)的計算方法
- 純液體汽化熱的計算方法
- 海峽兩岸海商法海事索賠責任限額計算方法之比較研究
- 清潔生產技術經濟誘因的評估方式
- 冷卻水塔之熱力計算方法(下)
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Enhancing the Sensitivity of the Stroop Test in Detecting Executive Function Using a New Computation of the Interference Score=新的干擾分數的計算增強Stroop測驗測量執行功能的敏感度 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 謝毅興; 陳冠臻; 王瑾琦; 賴秋蓮; |
作者姓名(外文) | Hsieh, Yi-hsing; Chen, Kuan-jen; Wang, Chin-chi; Lai, Chiou-lian; |
書刊名 | 臨床心理學刊 |
卷期 | 3:2 民95.12 |
頁次 | 頁76-84 |
分類號 | 415.8471 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 巴金森症; 執行功能; Stroop測驗; 干擾分數; 計算方法; Parkinson's disease; Executive function; Stroop test; Interference score; Computation method; |
中文摘要 | 目的:本研究比較三個計算Comalli版Stroop測驗干擾分數的方法,包括原本的比例分數,和另外兩個根據Golden公式導出的計算方法。方法:研究一使用27名患巴金森症病人(17名男性和10名女性,平均年齡63.3±10.5歲),研究二使用14名額葉損傷病人(9名男性和5名女性,平均年齡52.5±15.1歲),比較病人組和正常組在Stroop測驗的表現,分別使用三種計算方法算得干擾分數,以檢驗那一個計算方法能夠區辨兩組在執行功能上的差異。結果:相較於正常組,巴金森症病人和額葉損傷病人表現出比較大的Stroop干擾,但只有在Golden公式導出的計算方法才得到顯著差異。結論:如果是臨床的目的使用Stroop測驗,鑑於測驗的敏感度,Golden公式導出的計算方法優於比例分數。 |
英文摘要 | Objective: This study compared three computation methods of an interference score for the Comalli et al.'s version of the Stroop test, including the proportion score that is typically used and the other two based on Golden's formula. Method: We collected data from two patient groups with differing executive dysfunction (Parkinson's disease and frontal lobe lesion) and their respective controls. The Parkinson's disease group consisted of 27 patients (17 men and 10 women; mean age 63.5 + 10.5) and there were 14 patients (9 men and 5 women; mean age 52.5 + 15.1) with frontal lobe lesions. We applied the above three formulae to the data to examine which method has better sensitivity to differentiate patients from controls. Results: PD patients and frontal damaged patients showed greater interference than normal controls only for the formula adapted from Golden's. Conclusion: For clinical use, Golden-based formula is better than a proportion score in terms of the sensitivity of the test. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。