頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 中共陪審制度與審判委員會之關係=Relationship between the Judicial Committee and the Assessor System of the Chinese Communist Party |
---|---|
作者 | 錢炳村; | 書刊名 | 稻江學報 |
卷期 | 2:2 2007.12[民96.12] |
頁次 | 頁151-165 |
分類號 | 587.822 |
關鍵詞 | 審判委員會; 人民陪審制; 公開原則; Judicial committee; The people's assessor system; Public principle; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中共之審判制度存在著在民主國家看來格格不入之兩套制度,即審判委員會及人民陪審制,因若需先經審判委員會決定案件之處理,則人民陪審制形同虛設,即經審判委員會決定之案件,人民陪審員及審判員只是配合演出,實際是陪而不審,無法改變已經審判委員會決定之處理結果,若先經人民陪審,則陪審員及審判員之意見具不確定性,因審判委員會可能予以變更,是故這二種制度之存在,除非案件不經過審判委員會,否則會存在矛盾之現象。 |
英文摘要 | In the judicial system of the Chinese communist party, there are two different systems which are incompatible with each other for the democratic countries, there are the judicial committee and the people's assessor system, because the cases are decided by the judicial committee first, the people's assessor system performs practically no function, this means, the cases decided by the judicial committee, the people's assessors and judges only coordinate to act, in the reality, only accompany but no judicial function, it cannot modify the decision made by the judicial committee. It the case is through the people's assessor first, then the opinions of the assessor and judge have uncertainty, because the judicial committee could change the decision; therefore, the existence of these two systems might be contradictory, unless the cases would not be reviewed by the judicial committee. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。