查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 融會在玉米田裡的「非男性」科學--關於「女性科學」的哲學論爭與新發展=A Feeling for Corn Field in Keller's "Non-Masculine" Science |
---|---|
作 者 | 傅大為; | 書刊名 | 歐美研究 |
卷 期 | 29:2 1999.06[民88.06] |
頁 次 | 頁1-40 |
分類號 | 544.5 |
關鍵詞 | 女性主義科學; 男性科學; Feminist science; Masculine science; Keller; Harding; McClintock; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文分成幾個部分: 一、從生物學史中定位 McClintock 當年特殊的科學感知 ,「非男性」科學的特色;二、討論女性主義者如 Keller,還有 Harding 等人對「女性科 學」的不同觀點,還有對 McClintock 科學研究的不同評價。三、四兩節,我對 Keller 的 名著 -- A Feeling for the Organism 作了一個仔細的語言 / 象徵 / 論述之分析, 發現 McClintock 與自然的關係大概有四種模型, 比 Keller 有點浪漫的「愛」的模型要複雜很 多,並且,McClintock 與自然「融會」的科學, 也沒有辦法避免傅科所指出的,在「機構 中的研究者」如 McClintock,與被研究者(玉米)彼此之間的權力宰制關係。 畢竟,我們 有的只是「部分」的非男性科學, 而 Harding 對玉米田裡非男性科學的評價,值得我們進 一步反省。 |
英文摘要 | This is a study of McClintock's science and feminist interpreations of it, viewed through the lens of Keller's famous biographical study, A Feeling for the Organism. In addition to presenting a historically situated understanding of McClintock's "non-masculine" science, as interpreted y Keller and questioned by Harding, I offer a detailed discursive analysis of Keller's biography itself. What I found can be summerized into four different models of McClintock's relations with nature (or with her research subjects) , a picture more complicated than Keller's own "eros" model. Moreover, my analysis reveals a special dimension of power relationship in the Foucauldian sense, between McClintock's research team as a dominant institutional power, and her research subjects. I argue that McClintock's science is, perhaps, a non-masculine science only in a partial sense. Further, this analysis also concurs with Harding's reservations about the value of McClintock's science as paradigmatic feminist science. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。