頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 大學自治的性質與概念之釐清=Clarification on the Nature and the Concept of University Autonomy |
---|---|
作 者 | 張陳弘; | 書刊名 | 東吳法研論集 |
卷 期 | 2 民95.04 |
頁 次 | 頁135-188 |
分類號 | 525.023 |
關鍵詞 | 大學自治; 制度性權利; 制度性保障; 學術自由; Institutional atonomy; Academic freedom; University autonomy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 憲法第11條保障的學術自由權有兩種主要內涵:一是「個人性學術自由權」;另一為「制度性學術自由權」。兩者各自負擔不同的角色功能,既相輔相成,也相互抗衡。本文對於大學自治性質與概念之釐清,就是要打破目前國內對於大學自治的理解多定位於實現個人學術自由權的「工具」,以致大學自治的行使一旦與個人學術自由權產生碰撞時,就必須退讓的想法。而這樣的結果實導因於將憲法第11條保障之學術自由等同於個人的學術自由權。本文對於大學自治的理解,重點就在於跳脫上述框架,重新建構憲法保障學術自由之內涵,不僅只有「個人性學術自由權」,甚且更重要的在於「制度性學術自由權」的作用,兩者並立、功能相異,非「主、客」關係。 |
英文摘要 | Academic freedom as protected under Article 11 of the Constitution of the Republic of China (the “Constitution”) shall be viewed from two concepts: “individual academic freedom” and “institutional academic freedom”, both could be co- existing with separate functions. This article would be focused on the clarification on the concept of university autonomy, which was commonly defined as “measure” to facilitate the individual academic freedom and, if any contraction occurs, the latter would prevail. As a result, the concept of academic freedom protected under Article 11 of Constitution was interpreted as solely for individual academic freedom. This article would provide a view to restructure the concept of the academic freedom under the Constitution which shall consist of both “individual academic freedom” and “institutional academic freedom” with equal importance. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。