查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Transanal Local Excision Versus Radical Surgery for T1N0 Lower Rectal Adenocarcinoma
- Worse Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients with Preoperative Radiotherapy Compared to without Radiotherapy in Same Postoperative Pathologic pN1 Classification
- 母兔產仔性狀之品種比較
- 不同飼糧纖維含量餵飼臺灣黑豬及藍瑞斯母豬對繁殖性能及仔豬育成之影響
- 紐西蘭白兔產仔性能與其在夏季之低落現象
- 成人低惡性度顱內星狀細胞瘤之術後放射治療
- The Role of Radiotherapy for Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
- 應用存活分析法於員工流動率研究的探討
- 新母豬配種後30天內飼料攝食量和熱緊迫對於胚胎存活率等影響之研究
- Surgical Reconstruction for Buccal Cancer in Eastern Taiwan
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Transanal Local Excision Versus Radical Surgery for T1N0 Lower Rectal Adenocarcinoma=T1N0低位直腸腺癌之經肛門局部切除術與根治手術之比較 |
---|---|
作 者 | 林雅慧; 洪欣園; 陳進勛; 王正儀; 張簡俊榮; 唐瑞平; 游耀東; 江支銘; 葉建裕; 謝寶秀; 蔡文司; 游正府; 蔣昇甫; 賴正洲; | 書刊名 | 中華民國大腸直腸外科醫學會雜誌 |
卷 期 | 25:4 2014.12[民103.12] |
頁 次 | 頁141-150 |
分類號 | 416.245 |
關鍵詞 | 直腸惡性腫瘤; 局部切除; 存活率; Rectal adenocarcinoma; Local excision; Survival; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 目的 本研究的目的是比較治療T1N0期直腸癌利用經肛門局部切除手術或根治性手術其二者效果和生存率是否有差異。方法 我們回顧性分析在1995年5月至2013年1月間,患者全部都是T1期直腸腺癌(病理pT1期無手術前輔助化療或放射治療)。其中有87例患者接受經肛門局部切除術和176例患者接受根治性手術治療。結果 平均年齡,性別分佈,癌胚抗原水平(CEA)的結果在這2組間是相似的。平均住院時間在局部切除術這組為4.66天,而在根治性手術組為12.32天(p<0.05)。5年總生存率(overall survival),在局部切除術這組為為91%,而在根治性手術組為83%(p =0.928)。5年無病生存期(disease-free survival),在局部切除術這組為87%,而在根治性手術組為93%(p=0.037)。局部切除術這組的5年無病生存期(disease-free survival)顯著較差。結論 局部切除是治療早期低位直腸癌腺癌的一種替代方法。經篩選後局部切除術其預後是與根治性手術相似。局部切除術的優點包括早期腸道功能恢復,縮短住院時間,降低併發症和避免人工造口形成。 |
英文摘要 | Background. The aim of this study was to compare surgical outcomes including survival in T1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma patients undergoing transanal local excision or radical surgery. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed 87 and 176 patients who underwent transanal local excision and radical surgery, respectively, for T1N0 rectal adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy between May 1995 and January 2013. Results. The mean age, sex distribution, and carcinoembryonic antigen level were similar between the 2 groups. The mean duration of hospital stay was 4.66 days in the local resection group and 12.32 days in the radical surgery group (p<0.05). The overall survival rate at 5 years was 91% in the local resection group and 83% in the radical surgery group (p=0.928). The disease-free survival rate at 5 years was 87% in the local resection group and 93% in the radical surgery group (p=0.037). The disease- free survival rate at 5 years in the local resection group was significantly poorer than in the radical surgery group. Conclusion. Local excision is an alternative method of treatment for early lower rectal adenocarcinoma. With selection, the oncologic outcomes for local excision are similar to that of radical surgery. Advantages of local excision include early bowel function recovery, shorter hospital length of stay, lower morbidity, and avoidance of colostomy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。