查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 關係的比較學=Comparison as Relation |
---|---|
作 者 | 史書美; 楊露迻; 張錦忠; 史書美; | 書刊名 | 中山人文學報 |
卷 期 | 39 2015.07[民104.07] |
頁 次 | 頁1-19 |
分類號 | 815 |
關鍵詞 | 關係比較學; 葛里桑; 墾殖園弧線; 福克納; 張貴興; 翠西亞.鮑威爾; Relational comparison; Édouard Glissant; Plantation arc; William Faulkner; Chang Kuei-hsing; Patricia Powell; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文提出一個我稱之為「關係的比較」的新比較理論芻議,主張從事關係的比較學,或視比較文學為關係研究。為了建立關係比較學的理論框架,我將先探討珍納.阿布-勒赫(Janet L. Abu-Lughod)、約翰.霍布森(John M. Hobson)和安德烈.岡德.弗蘭克(André Gunder Frank)等學者所闡述的一體化世界史理論,再結合馬提尼克思想家愛德瓦.葛里桑(Édouard Glissant)所提出的關係理論(theory of Relation),連結地理文化史、社會經濟史、文學與詩學。論文以「墾殖園弧線」為聚焦點,沿著加勒比海地區延伸至美國南部以及東南亞,再折返加勒比海,分別分析福克納的南方小說、張貴興《猴杯》的婆羅洲熱帶雨林故事、及翠西亞.鮑威爾(Patricia Powell)筆下黑人,進口苦力的白種商人、華人苦力與小店主聚居的牙買加。本文要旨有二:首先,我要說明以敏銳的世界史觀進行關係研究,如何要求世界文學需盡可能更嚴肅看待其「在世性」;其次,我要證明關係的比較學如何為比較文學打造新舞臺,甚至開啟新的生命。 |
英文摘要 | This essay is a modest proposal for relational comparison. It argues for comparison as relation, or doing comparative literature as relational studies. To set up the relational framework, I first draw insights from the integrative world history detailed by such scholars as Janet L. Abu-Lughod, John M. Hobson, and André Gunder Frank. I synthesize these findings with the theory of Relation developed by Édouard Glissant as a way to link geocultural and socioeconomic history not only to literature but also to poetics. The specific pivot traces what I call the "plantation arc," stretching from the Caribbean to the American South and to Southeast Asia. I examine the interconnectedness of the literary works along the post-slavery plantation arc such as the plantation novels of William Faulkner set in the American South, Chang Kuei-hsing's Monkey Cup set in the Borneo rainforest and the Caribbean of Patricia Powell, the Jamaica of post-abolition blacks, white coolie traders, Chinese coolies, and shopkeepers. The purpose here is two fold: first, to illustrate how doing relational studies with a keen world historical sense demands that world literature take its worldliness more seriously than thought possible; and second, to show how relational comparison opens up a new arena, perhaps even a new life, for comparative literature. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。