查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 從心智模式論點探討兒童邏輯推理能力之發展
- 兒童邏輯推理測驗之研發與初探
- 談「說話的思維方法」
- 類比理論及其在電腦教學上應用
- Applying Item Response Theory to Science Educational Measurement:Galt and Tips
- 心智模式取向之智慧型電腦輔助診斷學習系統研究成果
- 為三段論式求構造原則
- 亞里斯多德三段論的現代表達法
- [傅成綸著]〈為三段論式求構造原則〉一文讀後
- The Influence of Pupils' Thinking Skills: Implementing Computer Programming Instruction (LOGO) in Elementary School in Taiwan
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 兒童邏輯推理測驗之研發與初探=The Development of the Logical Reasoning Test for Children |
---|---|
作 者 | 江淑卿; | 書刊名 | 屏東教育大學學報. 教育類 |
卷 期 | 28 2007.09[民96.09] |
頁 次 | 頁39-69 |
分類號 | 173.1 |
關鍵詞 | 心智模式; 三段論; 關係邏輯; 邏輯推理; Mental model; Syllogisms; Relational logic; Logical reasoning; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究根據心智模式的論點,研發適用於幼稚園大班至小學高年級的「兒童邏輯推理測驗」,編製「三段論分測驗」和「關係邏輯分測驗」,兩個分測驗各設計兩種難度的圖畫題和語文題,共32題,採個別施測。以185位兒童為預試對象,經試題分析所選擇的正式試題之鑑別指數和難度指數適切。正式施測結果顯示本測驗具有合宜的內部一致性、重測信度和效標關聯效度。本研究進一步以120位大班至五年級兒童為對象,探討六個年齡組兒童在不同類型、難度和符號表徵問題的邏輯推理能力之差異。研究發現:1.較高年齡組在邏輯推理測驗、三段論分測驗、關係邏輯分測驗的能力,大致比較低年齡組的能力為佳,顯示整體測驗與兩個分測驗能區辨跨年齡組能力之差異,且各年齡組在關係邏輯分測驗比三段論分測驗的能力佳。2.較高年齡組在兩個分測驗的難度Ⅰ/ 難度Ⅱ問題之能力,大致比較低年齡組的能力為佳,其中難度Ⅱ問題較難度Ⅰ問題能區辨跨年齡組能力的差異,且各年齡組在難度Ⅰ問題比難度Ⅱ問題的能力佳。3.較高年齡組在兩個分測驗的圖畫/ 語文問題之能力,大致比較低年齡組的能力為佳,其中語文問題較圖畫問題能區辨跨年齡組能力的差異,且大班至三年級在圖畫問題比語文問題的能力佳,四、五年級在不同符號表徵問題的能力則無差異。本測驗可作為認知發展研究、智力評估、科學教學評量之參考工具。 |
英文摘要 | The purpose of this study was to develop the Logical Reasoning Test for Children in order to evaluate the logic reasoning ability of kindergarten and primary school children, based on the perspective of the mental model. This individualized test included 32 test items, and was consisted of two subtests which are syllogism and relational logic. Each subtest included both figural and verbal tasks with two different level of difficulty. The discriminate indexes and difficulty indexes to the formal test items of this test appeared to be acceptable, which conducted by the item analysis and pretest on 185 subjects. Besides, this test had satisfactory internal-consistency, test-retest reliability, criterion- related validity. Furthermore, this test was used to explore the differences of logical reasoning ability in type, difficulty and symbolism among six different age groups. There were 120 children from kindergarten to grade five participated. The results indicated: (1) the abilities of older children were better than that of younger children to solve the Logical Reasoning Test and two subtests. Children had better abilities to solve the relational logic subtest than to do the syllogisms subtest in each age group. (2)The abilities of older children were better than that of younger children to solve the difficulty I / difficultyⅡtasks of two subtests. Children had better abilities to solve the difficulty I tasks than to do the difficultyⅡtasks in each age group. And (3) the abilities of older children were better than that of younger children to solve the figural / verbal tasks of two subtests. The figural tasks had better discrimination than the verbal tasks in age differences. The younger children had better abilities to solve the figure tasks than to do the verbal tasks. The older children’s abilities were less affected by the symbolism of tasks. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。