查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 日治時期行政統治策略之後殖民分析
- 書寫的斷裂:日本記憶在臺灣的轉換
- 洋服、和服、臺灣服--日治時期臺灣多元的服裝文化
- Review of Taiwan in Japan's Empire-building & Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule, 1895~1945[Book Review: 1. Ts'ai, Caroline Hui-yu, «Taiwan in Japan's Empire-building: An Institutional Approach to Colonial Engineering» (Lindon, New York: Routledge, 2009 ) 2. Liao Ping-hui and David Der-wei Wang, eds., «Taiwan under Japanese Colonial Rule 1895~1945, History, Culture, Memory» (New York: Columbia University Press, 2006)]
- 評介荊子馨著《成為日本人:殖民地臺灣與認同政治》
- 後殖民研究的去脈絡化困境與轉機--述評荊子馨著,鄭力軒譯,《成為「日本人」--殖民地臺灣與認同政治》(臺北市:麥田出版, 2006)
- 在帝國醫學與殖民醫學的夾縫之中:日治時期臺灣人腳氣病問題
- 從後殖民主義看吳濁流的〈先生媽〉的角色衝突
- 後殖民時代的展覽策略
- Macondo: The Death of a Post-Colonial City in One Hundred Years of Solitude
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 日治時期行政統治策略之後殖民分析=Postcolonial Analysis of Administrative Strategies in the Period of Japanese Government |
---|---|
作者 | 吳宗仁; 張雅淨; Wu, Tsung-jen; Chang, Ya-ching; |
期刊 | 淡江人文社會學刊 |
出版日期 | 20051200 |
卷期 | 24 民94.12 |
頁次 | 頁89-110 |
分類號 | 577.531 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 殖民; 後殖民; 日治時期; Colonization; Postcoloniality; Period of Japanese government; |
中文摘要 | 臺灣自一八九五年至一九四五年,共被日本統治五十年之久。日本人在臺灣的統治利用了許多不同的統治策略,進行了對臺灣社會從上到下的監控。在這五十年的統治過程中,日本人主要利用了警察與保甲制度,吸收了臺灣本地的菁英,將之納為日本人在臺統治的地方代理者。同時,也適時的消弭了許多可能發生的反抗殖民者運動。 本篇文章的寫作主要是透過後殖民論述(postcoloniality)來檢視日治時期日本人在臺的殖民統治策略。所謂的殖民與後殖民最大的不同在於,後殖民學者最關心的核心內涵是「被殖民者的身份是一種建構,是一種經由武力征服和文化移植雙重手段而完成的過程。」而後殖民論者所強調的,也正是如何從過去及現在的歷史經驗中尋找和發現屬於自身文化的特殊性。 因此,本篇文章試圖藉由後殖民的一些概念,如他者(theother) 、混雜(hybridity)、內部殖民(internal coloniality),來檢視日治時期日人在臺統治策略的後殖民意涵,期盼能對日治時期臺灣史給予一個超越史學的不同解讀。 |
英文摘要 | From 1895 to 1945, Taiwan was governed by Japan totaling fifty years. Japanese monitored Taiwanese society through various kinds of colonial strategies. During this period, they recruited the Taiwanese elite as local monitoring agents mainly using the police and Pao-Jia institution. Meanwhile, the Japanese also eliminated large numbers of revolutionary movements and revolutions. This report examines Japanese policy and management during the period of Japanese government through postcolonial discourses. The most obvious difference between “colonization” and “postcoloniality” lies in the core content. For the core content post-colonial scholars, “the identity of the colonized is a kind of construction and a sort of outcome made by military force and culture-transfer”. Post-colonial scholars put emphasis on how to find the specification of self-culture through the experience of the past history. Furthermore, this report examines the meaning of post-colonization during the period that Japan governed through such concepts, as “the other”, “hybridity” and “internal coloniality”. The purpose of this report is to give a different explanation for the historical period of the Japanese government of Taiwan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。