查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 技術論述的政策合理化作用:以紀德艦購案正當性為例=Technological Rhetoric as Policy Reasoning: Case Study on the Kidd Destroyers Acquisition |
---|---|
作者 | 陳世榮; Chen, Roger S.; |
期刊 | 東吳政治學報 |
出版日期 | 20050300 |
卷期 | 20 民94.03 |
頁次 | 頁115-145 |
分類號 | 599.12 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 技術論述; 政策合理化; 科學評估; 紀德級艦; 政策責任; Technological rhetoric; Policy reasoning; Scientific assessment; Kiddclass destroyers; Policy accountability; |
中文摘要 | 當社會愈來愈需要科技來協助政策決定時,卻發現科技也成為政策爭議的焦點,這種「政治科學化」與「科學政治化」所交織成的複雜互動關係,使得政策過程中的科技論述角色有重新加以探討的必要。不同於傳統將「科技」與「政治」作二分的認知,晚近「科技社會研究」認為科技仍為社會建構的產物,其效力也受著外部社會文化的形塑。本文即依循此一進路,探究作為政策合理化的技術宣稱,置關注焦點於「官方」的技術論述呈現。本文以台灣紀德級艦採購案為對象,探討政策過程中軍方技術性評估與論述的角色,究明其構成政策正當性的實際效果。本研究發現,技術論述不僅是軍方所提正當性框架的基礎,同時對於紀德級艦性能的描繪也發揮了淋漓盡致的效果,鞏固了購案的合理性。不過,這些看似明確、完整、合理的技術論述,透過另類詮釋卻發現有其模糊、片面與不足之處,顯示技術論述的彈性與複雜,其在政策系絡中難以避免地具有協商性格,因此僅以官方內部的技術評估作為政策正當性的主要理據有其侷限與不足。政府部門有必要將其技術論證置於多元評估機制中接受檢證,而「官方」技術論述更必須認知與承擔政策與社會所賦予的責任,以維護技術表述在政策倡議時的可靠度。 |
英文摘要 | While science and technology have been called on to assist decision making in a variety of policy areas, it is also found that science and technology have been caught in the center of policy controversies. The parallel phenomena of “scientification of politics” and “politicisation of science” give rise to academic contemplation over the role of technological discourse within policy context. Drawing on the notions of “Science and Technology Studies”, this paper aims to shed light on the functions of official technological rhetoric as policy reasoning. By observing Taiwan’s controversy on the acquisition of Kidd destroyers this study probes the role of military technological rhetoric and its functions in policy legitimatization so as to illuminate the adequacy and accountability of official technological statements for policy advocacy. It is found that technological discourse was one of the fundamental dimensions in official policy reasoning for the acquisition. It was well presented in the portrayal of Kidds’ warfare capability which further strengthened the rationality of the purchase. However, ambiguity, contradictory and uncertainty can still be unearthed in the seemingly impartial, comprehensive and rational technological rhetoric of the military, demonstrating manipulation and negotiation characters of technological claims employed in policy process. Apparently, official scientific assessments and technological statements alone are insufficient to justify science-related policy. To fulfill policy and social accountability, it is essential that governmental sectors must maintain the credibility of their own technological judgments and actively facilitate the formation of a platform for multiple scrutiny and alternative verifications, by which technological discourse can be presented symmetrically and adequately in policy deliberation. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。