查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 如何正確評價黃丕烈在版本學上的貢獻=How to Evaluate the Contribution of Huang Pilie in Bibliology |
---|---|
作 者 | 王紹曾; | 書刊名 | 中國文哲研究集刊 |
卷 期 | 9 民85.09 |
頁 次 | 頁1-26 |
分類號 | 011.5 |
關鍵詞 | 黃丕烈; 校勘學; 文獻學; 版本學; Huang Pilie; Textual criticism; Bibliology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 黃丕烈是清代乾嘉之際著名的大藏書家,傑出的校勘學家、版本學家,為清代版本學的奠基和發展作出了不可磨滅的貢獻。然而從乾嘉時代起,對黃丕烈的評價,就有著不同的看法,洪亮吉有意識地把他看成是藏書家中的賞鑒家。自稱是黃丕烈的知己朋友嚴可均,對他「蓄書多宋本」,提出了異議。直到現代,如著名學者余嘉錫、張舜徽,都對黃丕烈抱著很大的偏見,有意貶低黃丕烈在校勘學、版本學上的貢獻。論文首先指出洪亮吉眼裡的所謂「賞鑒家」,實際上是骨董家的別稱。他們都錯誤地理解黃丕烈的「佞宋」是對宋本書的盲目崇拜。文章著重說明,「佞宋」是在特定時代條件下藏書家、校勘家追求的目標,並不是什麼壞事。接著引用大量黃跋,用他自己的話和校勘實踐,證明黃丕烈並不盲目崇拜宋本,而且不諱言宋本的缺點,甚至說有些宋本還不如明本。他主張衡量版本的優劣,必須取決於校勘的結果,堅決反對口說耳食以定是非。文章用具體事實,證明黃丕烈在版本問題上具有實事求是的科學態度。從根本上澄清了對佞宋的誤解。文章進一步論證了黃丕烈在校勘學上的成就,肯定黃校本是影宋影元鈔本的一大發展,為版本學增加了新的內涵,在校勘學、版本學上有著重要的作用。文章最後得出結論,黃丕烈是一代版本學宗師,是清代版本學的奠基人,在版本學史上起著承先啟後的作用。在乾嘉以來將近兩百年中,有著深遠的影響。 |
英文摘要 | Huang Pilie was a great and famous book collector, an outstanding expert in textual criticism and bibliography in the Qianlong-Jiaqing periods of the Qing dynasty. He made immortal contributions to the basics and development of bibliology in his lifetime. But there were different opinions of Huang from then on. For example, Hong Liangji deliberately regarded him as a bibliophile among book collectors. Yan Kejun, who declared himself to be Huang's bosom friend, raised an objection to his emphasis on collecting more Song edition books, too. Up to now, eminent scholars, such as both Yu Jiaxi and Zhang Shunhui, have a prejudice against him, and belittle him on purpose. This article, at first, points out that a so-called bibliophile in Hong's eyes is actually another name for connoisseur of curios. They mistook Huang's passion for Song editions for blind worship of Song edition books. The article further clarifies that passion for Song editions is an aim for book collectors and textual critics under the conditions of particular eras, and is not a bad thing. Then the thesis quotes a great many of Huang's postscripts, showing with his own words and redaction practices that Huang not only did not blindly worship Song editions, but also spoke bluntly about their defects. He even said that some Song editions were not better than Ming editions. Huang recommended judging the edition by the resulting redaction. The paper uses concrete facts to demonstrate that Huang's attitude towards editions comprises a practical and realistic science, and completely clears up a misunderstanding about his passion for Song editions. This thesis expounds and justifies Huang's achievement in textual criticism, further demonstrating that Huang's redacted editions represented a great advance from photo-offset copies of Song and Yuan materials. They added new contents to bibliology and played an important part in bibliology and textual criticism. Finally, the article draws a conclusion that Huang Pilie was a master of great learning and integrity in bibliology; he laid a foundation for the bibliology of the Qing dynasty, and served as a link between past and future in the history of bibliology, which has had far-reaching influence since Qianlong-Jiaqing times. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。