查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 家庭因素與子女行為:臺灣研究的評析
- 影響學位取得的家庭因素--中美跨國比較之研究
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Coal Ash Artificial Reefs at Wan-Li, Northern Taiwan
- 記臺灣蘭科植物相新記錄種--緣毛松蘭
- 臺灣的氣候變化--氣溫和降水
- Change and Stability in the Dietary System of A Prehistoric: Coastal Population in Southern Taiwan: A Research Design
- Diurnal Vertical Distribution of Ichthyoplankton in I-Lan Bay, NE Taiwan
- 臺灣白鼻心之現況調查
- 《詩經.國風》與《臺灣國風》所隱現之情感教育
- 誰家的孩子看電視時間比較長?家庭因素對十八個月大兒童看電視時間的影響
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 家庭因素與子女行為:臺灣研究的評析=Effects of Family Factors on Child Behavior: A Review of Empirical Studies in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 楊國樞; | 書刊名 | 中華心理學刊 |
卷 期 | 28:1 1986.06[民75.06] |
頁 次 | 頁7-28 |
分類號 | 544.18 |
關鍵詞 | 家庭因素; 子女行為; 臺灣; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 過去三十多年來,此間的心理學者、教育學者、犯罪學者、精神醫學者及其他社會與行為科學家,曾先後從事五十多項探討家庭因素是否影響子女行為的實徵性研究。其中,探討家庭組成因素對子女行為的影響者約有八項,探討產序排行對子女行為的影響者約有九項,探討社經地位對子女行為的影響者約有十九項,探討教養方式對子女行為的影響者約有四十四項。經就上述四類研究的結果加以綜合與歸納,獲得多項暫時性的結論。惟以往之有關研究在理論與方法兩方面多有可加訾議之處,對此等結論的可靠性應持審慎態度。大體而言,在理論與方法兩方面,過去的研究約有以下幾項缺失:(1)理論基礎的缺乏或薄弱,(2)概念架構的粗疏與簡陋,(3)研究方法的限制或問題。文中曾就以上三類缺失加以討論,並進而提出可行的改進建議。 |
英文摘要 | The present paper attempts to provide a systematic review of more than 50 empirical studies on the effects of family factors on the behavior of Chinese children and adolescents in Taiwan, conducted in the last 30 years. A number of conclusions may be tentatively drawn as a result of such a literature review. First, eight studies have been published on the influence of factors of family composition.Some studies reported that children from nuclear family (NF) did better in their scholastic performance, as compared to those from stem and extended families (SF and EF); that the scholastic achievement of children from broken families was poorer than that of those fromun broken ones; and that children from larger families displayed a lower level of scholastic performance, but a higher level of language development, than those from smaller families. Other studies found that NF and SF children were more closed-minded than EF ones; that NF children and adolescents were higher in their sense of political efficacy than SF and EFones; and that father absence would lead to over-masculinity and maladjustment in the child. Second, nine studies have provided data on the effects of sibling position on child behavior. Inconsistent findings have been reported concerning the relationships of birth order tosuch psychological characteristics as psychogenic needs, ability in creative thinking, and levelin moral judgment. No definite conclusions can be drawn about the effects of ordinal positionon delinquent behavior, because of the unsoundness of the research design of the relevant studies. In some studies, however, only children were found to have a higher chance to besent by their parents to a psychological clinic for mental or behavior problems than those occupying other sibling positions. Third, 19 studies have reported data on the relationship between family socio-economicstatus (SES) and child behavior. It has been generally found that children and adolescents from families with a lower SES tend to be higher in delinquent and problem behavior andlower in intelligence, self-esteem, scholastic achievement, and the adequacy of study habits and attitudes. It has also been found that mother employment seems to be a disadvantage to the psychological well-being of the child: children having an employed mother are lower in their sense of security, higher in their aggressive and dependent behavior, and poorer in their adjustment in the relationship to mother. Finally, more than 44 studies have been devoted to the investigation of the relationships of child-rearing attitudes and practices to child behavior. Major findings are as follows: (1) Such child-rearing attitudes and behavior as acceptance, positive regard, and proper restraint had a positive effect on the child's self concept and self assertion, whereas authoritarianness a negative effect. (2) Rejection, strictness, and over-protection tended to be harmful to the development of achievement motive of the child. (3) Parental love, proper restraint, nonmaterial reward, and independence training were beneficial to the development of belief in internal control of reinforcement and to that of the disposition of internal causal attribution, whereas rejection, neglect, looseness, strictness, and arbitrary reward and punishment were harmful. (4) Good parent-child relationship and democratic parental attitudes and behavior had a positive effect on the development of the child's cognitive and creative abilities, whereas poor parent-child relationship and arbitrary interference a neglative effect. (5) Authoritarian child-rearing attitudes and behavior were disadvantageous to the development of the child's moral judgments. (6) Parental love, regard, warmth, reward, justice, and consistency had apositive effect on the scholastic achievement of the child, whereas rejection, neglect, strictnessand punishment a negative effect. (7) Parental love, regard, and reward had a positive effecton the social and emotional adjustment of the child, whereas rejection, neglect, control,strictness, inconsistency, punishment, authoritarianness, and over-protection a negative effect. (8) Parental love, regard, warmth, reward, and reasoning had a preventive effect on the child'sdelinquent and problem behaviors, whereas rejection, threat, strictness, inconsistency, authoritarianness, over-protection, and physical punishment a facilitating effect. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。