頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 魏晉時期《莊》學中的許、巢論述=The Xu-Cao Discourse in the Zhuangzi Studies of We-Jin Dynasties |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 紀志昌; | 書刊名 | 臺大中文學報 |
卷期 | 22 2005.06[民94.06] |
頁次 | 頁151-153+155-185 |
分類號 | 123.1 |
關鍵詞 | 魏晉; 莊學; 隱逸思想; 自然與名教; 高士傳; Wei-Jin dynasties; Zhuangzi studies; Philosophies of reclusion; Conformity and naturalness; Biographies of lofty recluses; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文所要處理的問題,乃欲藉由魏晉人對許 ( 許由 )、巢 ( 巢父 ) 的詮釋觀點,觀察此中隱逸思想的異同特徵與玄風之流衍。魏晉人的「許、巢論述」,典故源自《莊子》 ,首由嵇康《聖賢高士傳》承襲之,其後相關之詮釋架構與理解角度即或有同異。本文總諸「許、巢論述」,先陳述其內涵、思維特徵,復結合士人應對時局之自我情志觀照與出處進退動機,進探其背後之論據,尤與典故之源──《莊子》與當世《莊》學立場之關係,因之以作出一系統之疏理,歸結出魏晉士人受《莊》學影響所架構之「許、巢論述」大致有三個面向── ( 一 ) 以隱為高論 ( 二 ) 賢不及聖論 ( 三 ) 隱逸材用論。最後,復就與此論題相關涉之玄學主題: ( 一 ) 隱逸思想 ( 二 ) 自然與名教之辨 ( 三 ) 聖人論等三面向作出總結。 |
英文摘要 | This paper explores the commonali ties and divergences of the philosophies of recluse, as well as the transformation of the literati's metaphysical thought during the Wei-Jin Dynasties. It does so by looking closely at the contemporary views of Xu You and Cao Fu, or what is called "Xu-Cao discourse" in the paper. Traceable to the classical Taoist text Zhuangzi, the Xu-Cao discourse of Wei-Jin periods was inaugurated by Ji Kang in his Biographies of Sages, Wise Men, and Lofty Recluses (Shengxian gaoshi zhuan). Kang was followed by many others, who further developed new and sometimes quite different lines of interpretations on Xu and Cao. The paper first examines the basic structure and ideas of the discourse. It then contextualizes the discourse against the various ways in which the literati understood both their times and their own vocations, as well as the ways in which they faced up to the choice of entering a governmental office or not. Furthermore, the paper investigates the discourse's theoretical underpinnings by clarifying its connections to two intellectual sources: the Zhuangzi and contemporary Zhuangzi studies. It indicates that contemporary Zhuangzi studies had shaped the formation of the discourse in three major aspects: (1) yiyin weigao lun, the notion that the worth of reclusion is higher than that of holding an office; (2) xian buji sheng lun; the notion that a man of virtue is lesser than a sage; (3) yinyi caiyong lun, the notion that a hermit can also be serviceable. Finally, the paper relates to the Neo-Taoism of Wei-Jin periods and ends with a discussion on three prominent issues: (1) the philosophies of reclusion; (2) the controversy over conformity and naturalness; (3) the doctrine of sagehood. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。