頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 公司治理方法論的發展--從美國國內法到國際法的學術整合=The Development of Corporate Governance Methodology: From U.S. Domestic Law to Global Inter-disciplinary Studies |
---|---|
作 者 | 易明秋; | 書刊名 | 東海大學法學研究 |
卷 期 | 22 民94.06 |
頁 次 | 頁57-99 |
分類號 | 587.2 |
關鍵詞 | 公司治理; 學術整合; 比較法; 公司法; 腳步依循理論; 方法論; 全球性調查; Corporate governance; Inter-disciplinary studies; Corporate law; Path dependence; Methodology; Global survey; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文討論的課題有下:(1)說明公司治理是美國公司法研究所產生的觀念,源自於伯理與明斯對公開發行公司所有權與經營權之觀察,而隨著時代改變其課題亦不同;(1)美國公司治理研究的發展是從法學開始,次及於經濟及其他社會科學,近來整合性研究大行;(3)美國公司治理模式與其他經濟先進國家有相當之不同,但美國公司治理模式開始影響其他國家,學者亦開始從事比較制度與效率關連性之研究,本文結論則建議我國學者在從事國內公司治理研究時,應了解方法論與制度在移植時的國內外結構性差異,鼓勵從事整合性研究。 |
英文摘要 | This paper discusses the following three issues. First, I explain the corporate governance is product of American corporate law development, originated from the Berle and Means’ observation of public companies’ separation of ownership and control in 1920s, of which the issues changed as time passed. Second, it was legal study that first paid attention to corporate governance, then economic and other social science followed. However, recently the inter-disciplinary research in this subject is becoming popular. Third, U.S. corporate governance mode is quite different from other advanced economies, but American mode is infiltrating other countries, and scholars have begun to research the relationship between different systems and their respective efficiency. In conclusion, I suggest when we study Taiwan’s corporate governance, we appreciate the institutional difference between foreign systems and ours with methodology awareness. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。