查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 建構大法官實際決策行為模型=Constructing the Decision-Making Model of Taiwan's Grand Justices |
---|---|
作者 | 楊智傑; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷期 | 81 2004.10[民93.10] |
頁次 | 頁111-156 |
分類號 | 589.6 |
關鍵詞 | 大法官; 違憲審查; 憲法解釋; 決策行為模型; 法律圈; 賽局模型; 利益團體; Grand justice; Decision-making model; Game theory; Constitutional interpretation; Lawyers; Interest group; Constitutional judicial review; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文嘗試研究大法官在做決策時,真正的決定因素為何?是某種大法官自己 曾經表態願意遵照的憲法解釋方法嗎?還是大法官自己個人的政策偏好?或者 政治部門對大法官決策時會有所影響呢?美國法律經濟學界和政治學界對這個 議題的研究,已經有相當的成果,一方面已有各種實證資料,一方面也有學者嘗 試建立各種模型來說明大法官的決策行為,故本文會加以整理介紹並評述分析。 本文除了介紹完相關的論述後,筆者想針對台灣情況,大膽地提出台灣大法 官的決策模型。筆者將以 Marks 模型為基礎,針對台灣情形提出一修正。筆者認 為在台灣,政治部門對大法官影響力日漸衰退,而法律圈對大法官決定的影響力 卻透過各種方式逐漸增加。本文並會提出一些證據證明該模型的解釋力。 |
英文摘要 | What are the real elements that affect the decision-making of Taiwan’s Grand Justices? Are they some interpretation methods the Grand Justices have publicly recognized? Does their ideology have the main effects? Or the political departments have more effects than other elements? The law-economical and political academics in America have arrived much achievement in this field. I will take a detailed review of their results and try to analyze them. The models American scholars have constructed are based on the American experiences but not on Taiwan. So, after analyzing these models, I will try to construct the decision-making model of Taiwan’s Grand Justice. I will refine the Mark’s model to fit the reality in Taiwan. I suggest that the political departments have less effect on decision-making of Grand Justices, and the lawyers have more and more effect. I will try to bring up some evidences to proof my model. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。