查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 淺論專利審查基準的法律性質及司法審查=An Introduction to Legal Classification and Judicial Examination of the Patent Examination Standard |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳文賓; | 書刊名 | 智慧財產權月刊 |
卷 期 | 49 2003.01[民92.01] |
頁 次 | 頁49-64 |
分類號 | 440.6 |
關鍵詞 | 專利; 專利審查基準; 行政規則; Patent; Patent examination standard; Administrative rules; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 專利事件雖事涉專業化及技術化,然亦不能完全排除行政程序法之適用;我國專利審查基準之法律性質係行政程序法第一百五十九條第二項第二款所定之行政規則,僅間接對外發生效力。智熽財產局近年在制訂相關專利審查基準時,人民已有機會表示相關興革建議。行政法院在審理專利申請案件時,一般均不審酌審查基準之妥當性,具體案件中,除了因審查違反往例、核駁理由違反經驗法則或被告機關對重要證據略未斟酌外,原告較難得到勝訴判決。 |
英文摘要 | Although patent matters involved professionalism and technicalness, yet we can not exclude the application of Law of Administrative Procedures. The juridical classification of Patent Examination Standard of R.O.C. is "Administrative Rules" whose definition is legislated in the Article 159, 2nd item(2) of Law of Administrative Procedures. These "Administrative Rules" only indirectly confine applicants. As Intellectual Property Office revising Patent Examination Standard in recent years, civilian have had opportunities to express their suggestion and related constructive opinions. When judges of Court of Administrative Dispute reviewed those cases of patent applications, instead of considering whether those administration decision are proper or not, they only review whether those given litigation violate precedent; the reason of overruling patent application violate the empirical law; the defendant (patent office) overlooked critical evidence and did not take them into consideration in patent examining procedure. It is usually difficult for plaintiff to win a lawsuit. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。