查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 六頂思考帽訓練課程對提高國小資優生問題解決能力成效之研究=The Effect of "Six Thinking Hats" Training Course on Improving Problem Solving Ability of Elementary Gifted Students |
---|---|
作 者 | 王雅奇; | 書刊名 | 資優教育研究 |
卷 期 | 3:2 2003.12[民92.12] |
頁 次 | 頁65-84 |
分類號 | 529.61 |
關鍵詞 | 六頂思考帽; 國小資優生; 問題解決能力; Gifted students; Problem solving ability; Six thinking hats; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | The main purposes of this study were to design a thinking training course for 5th grade gifted students bases on de Bono' s "Six Thinking Hats", and to investigate the impacts of eleven-times training course on problem solving ability of gifted students in the elementary school. An nonequivalent pretest-posttest experimental design was employed. The subjects of this study involved twenty-eight students selected from Taipei Municipal Bi-Hu and Hu-Shi elementary schools. The experiment group consisting of 14 students from Bi-Hu elementary school attended a eleven-units thinking training course. The instruments are the Test of Problem Solving (TOPS) and performance assessment of problem solving. Those data were analyzed by one-way ANCOVA. The other instrument is the questionnaire Which designed to realize students feeling about the course. The major finding of this study were concluded as follows: 1.The assessment results of the Test of Problem Solving (TOPS) : (1)There were significant differences between the experiment group and the matched group on total scores (F=8.51, p<.05). (2)There were significant differences between the experiment group and the matched group in the following subtests: explaining inferences (F=24.44, p<.05), determining causes (F=22.34, p<.05), negative why questions (F=8.75, p<.05) and determining solutions (F=7.87, p<.05). But no significant difference m the "avoiding problems" subtest (F= 1.46, p>.05). Therefore, there was significant training effect on improving the problem solving ability of the experiment group. 2. The assessment results of the performance assessment: (1)There were significant differents between the experiment group and the matched group on total scores (F=19.12, p<.05). (2)There were significant differents between the experiment group and the matched group in the following subtests:"applying techniques to solve problems "(F=4.32, p<.05) and "evaluating effectiveness of solutions to problems" (F=5.09, p<.05). But no significant differences in the "identifying problem" (F= 1.17, p>.05) and "collecting information" (F=0.68, p>.05) subtest. 3.The subjects reported that they enjoyed the training course. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。