查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 當代哲學和神學相關問題--以海德格和拉納為例
- 論拉內神學思想中的海德格因素:一種思想接受史的研究
- 當代哲學和神學相關問題--以海德格和拉納為例
- 從哲學觀點論宗教、神學和宗教學相關問題
- 從哲學觀點論宗教和神學相關問題
- 盼望詮釋學與善之理念:一種莫特曼神學與柏拉圖哲學之對話嘗試
- 試論死亡在生命中的意義--由海德格及拉內觀點出發
- 布特曼與海德格:友誼以及在馬堡所共有的--儘管所有
- Revealing the Possibility of Relating Philosophy and Theology: Heidegger's Early Exploration of Sin
- 海德格的存有哲學及其對教育的蘊涵
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 當代哲學和神學相關問題--以海德格和拉納為例=Relationship Between Contemporary Philosophy and Theology--Heidegger and Rahner as Example |
---|---|
作 者 | 武金正; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 25:3=286 1998.03[民87.03] |
頁 次 | 頁241-260+300-301 |
分類號 | 147.72、147.72 |
關鍵詞 | 海德格; 拉內; 哲學; 神學; 非神哲學; 神學思考; 從下而上或從上而下的思路; Heidegger; Rahner; Philosophy; Theology; Atheistic Philosophy; Theology thinking; The way from below and from above; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文主要提出哲學家海德格和神學拉內,如何瞭解哲--神及神--哲的相關問題,並反省兩者的異同點。 約於一九一六年,海氏的生活及思想萌生重大的轉變;之後,稱自己的哲學為「非神的哲學」。然而該哲學並非「無神」,而是「思考的誠心」之態度。最後,他以天主教的回歸,明認人的希望為:「只有一位神能拯救我們」。這信息是終生尋找真理的一個謎。拉內在現代神學的脈絡中,用心地探討該問題:正如本性和恩寵雖各自獨立,但卻是從同一來源互動人,使人的本性在恩寵內圓滿;哲學與神學的相關亦復如此。而人就是體驗並建立理性和信仰關係的主體。他的生活是不斷在封閉和開放中抉擇,因此會陷於自我絕對化的情境。在此拉內提及「哲學的罪惡」,以及「人有無限能力」的冀望。海氏和拉氏兩者皆重視人為處理哲--神相關問題的主體。因此,他們都強調開放及末世的觀點。的確,其相異是顯然的;然而,可理解之為尋求真理的對立之張力:它或由下而上或反方向都是走向同一的真理,可謂殊途同歸。 |
英文摘要 | The article concerns the question how philosophy and theology relates to each other, as Heidegger elaborates from the point of philosophy and Rahner considers from the view of theology. Heidegger's “atheistic philosophy” is a consequence of taking distance from closed system. He understands philosophy however as “Piety of Thinking”, because he is continuously inspired by religious problematic. His last message as a returned Catholic is : “Only God can save us” as sign of enigmatic life of searching for the truth. Rahner elaborates the problem in modern theological context: just as nature and grace root in the same source, so do philosophy and theology. Human being is “Spirit in the World” which experiences and regulates the relationship between reason and faith. He is living in constant choice between closure and openess. Here Rahner speaks of “sin” not only in theology, but also in philosophy, when they are absoluted themselves. Just as Rahner pleads for pluralistic theology, he also thinks that no one philosophy can be the partner of theology. Consequently, any philosophy, especially suitable for requirements of modern time is estimated as partners of theological thinking. Heidegger and Rahner both take human being seriously as subject of regulation of relationship between philosophy and theology. Both stand for opening and eschatological view. Their difference could be seen as strike for the truth at the same path, from below and from above. It requires us to take this problematic seriously for ourselves. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。