查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Rules vs. Analogy in Mandarin Classifier Selection
- Bibliography on Chinese Classifiers and Measure Words
- 漢語分類詞之認知基礎研究--兼以閩南語個體量詞的使用之個案研究為例
- 量詞的探研
- Chinese Classifier Tiao Revisited: A Cognitive Linguistics Study
- 談新時期漢語量詞運用的新變化
- 漢語分類詞的語義與認知基礎:功能語法觀點
- 漢語詞彙教學研究--量詞篇
- Nouns or Classifiers: A Non-Movement Analysis of Classifiers in Chinese
- Structure of Classifiers and Measure Words: A Lexical Functional Account
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | Rules vs. Analogy in Mandarin Classifier Selection |
---|---|
作 者 | Myers, James; | 書刊名 | 語言暨語言學 |
卷 期 | 1:2 2000.07[民89.07] |
頁 次 | 頁187-209 |
分類號 | 802.6 |
關鍵詞 | 漢語; 量詞; 分類詞; Analogy; Rule; Classifier; Default rule; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
英文摘要 | A long-running debate concerns whether human language is processed solely by analogy to memorized exemplars, as connectionists have claimed, or instead may be processed by symbol-manipulating rules (e.g. Pinker 1999). In this paper we bring this debate to the Mandarin noun classifier system, arguing that the so-called general classifier 個 ge is selected by a default rule. Reviewing evidence from a variety of sources, including new corpus analyses, we first argue that the selection of most classifiers is lexically mediated, and then show that ge has no lexical semantics. Finally, we show that ge is used in a variety of situations that have nothing in common except for the inability to form analogies with examples in memory: when nouns are too dissimilar from lexical exemplars, are derived from other syntactic categories, or cooccur with classifiers too infrequently, and when speakers have memory access problems. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。