查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- AIDS、省府虛級化、與B型肝炎疫苗--科學知識在臺灣的一種社會建構歷程
- 免洗餐具的誕生:醫學知識在臺灣的社會性格分析
- 從社會建構論談國人憂鬱與自殺現象的隱憂
- Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Coal Ash Artificial Reefs at Wan-Li, Northern Taiwan
- 記臺灣蘭科植物相新記錄種--緣毛松蘭
- 臺灣的氣候變化--氣溫和降水
- Change and Stability in the Dietary System of A Prehistoric: Coastal Population in Southern Taiwan: A Research Design
- 大陸概念的社會建構:民眾與社會團體觀點的分析
- Diurnal Vertical Distribution of Ichthyoplankton in I-Lan Bay, NE Taiwan
- 臺灣白鼻心之現況調查
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | AIDS、省府虛級化、與B型肝炎疫苗--科學知識在臺灣的一種社會建構歷程=AIDS, the Diminishing Power of the Taiwan Provincial Government, and the Hepatitis B Vaccine: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 林崇熙; | 書刊名 | 新史學 |
卷 期 | 8:1 1997.03[民86.03] |
頁 次 | 頁89-134 |
分類號 | 418.293 |
關鍵詞 | 科學知識; 社會建構; B型肝炎疫苗; 科學史; 臺灣; Scientific knowledge; Social construction; Hepatitis B vaccine; History of science; Taiwan; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「科學」常被塑造成客觀、理性、追求真理的純真形象。然而,如果我們將科學 知識的黑箱打破,而去考察其形成過程,將可發現:科學家並不是唯一的科學知識生產者; 各式各樣的社會成員都有可能透過不同形式的管道「合法」地參與科學知識的形塑過程。本 文以 B 型肝炎血獎疫苗在一九九0年代初期臺灣的生命歷程, 考察相關於忐疫苗的科學知 識如何在政策考量、經濟活動、政治利益的糾葛中,不斷地被重新塑造;最後何以將在臺灣 以至全世界十多年來評價優良的 B 型肝炎血漿疫苗以「安全」為由而捨棄。 在此過程中, 當我們看到所謂「政治活動」、「經濟活動」等是內在於科學知識的生產過程時,傳統所謂 的科學理性、客觀、中性等概念就變成只是一種策略運用了。 |
英文摘要 | Examining the controversy regarding the asfety issues of the hepatitis B vaccines, this paper discusses how policy considerations, economic activities , and political interests shaped and reshaped the knowledge regarding the hepati tis B vaccines in Taiwan during the early 1990s. Quite contrary to the current image of science as an objective, rational, and truth-researching activity, I argue that both political activities and economic considerations are important dimensions of scientific practice. If we open the blackbox of scientific knowledge and investigate its formation process, we soon find that scientists are not the sole producers of scientific knowledge; that is, various participants besides scientists may enter scientific practice by bringing in a rang of ethical, economic, cultural, political, and technical issues and creat a controversy. Since various participants can simultaneously enlist contradictory scientific knowledge in their argument against each other, the privilege of scientific knowledge decreases; that is, scientific knowledge is not the sole arbitrator of a scientific controversy. When political negotiations, economic interests, and scientific arguments operate simultaneously within this controversy, they create new scientific knowledge regarding the hepatitis B vaccines. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。