查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- The Eye and the Pyramid: The Economy of Death in Melville's “Bartleby, the Scrivener”
- Socioeconomic Conditions and the Suicide Mortality Rate: A Trend Analysis in Taiwan, 1981~2007
- 集合住宅電力消費量之研究--以臺中市為例
- 以多目標規劃解析建築投資報酬與風險問題
- 經濟發展與消費環境變遷
- 顧客導向的省思與再突破:尋找服務的誘因結構
- 初探網路產業的市場規範及其未來:以United States V. Microsoft案的發展為主軸
- 「管子」消費正義思想之研究
- 全民健康保險中低收入戶保費補助之探討
- APEC EVSL對臺灣漁業之影響評估--漁業部門均衡模型之應用
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | The Eye and the Pyramid: The Economy of Death in Melville's “Bartleby, the Scrivener”=眼與金字塔:梅爾維爾〈抄寫員巴托比〉中的死亡經濟 |
---|---|
作者 | 王俊三; Wang, Chun-san; |
期刊 | 興大人文學報 |
出版日期 | 20030600 |
卷期 | 33(上) 民92.06 |
頁次 | 頁381-404 |
分類號 | 874.57 |
語文 | eng |
關鍵詞 | 建築; 消費; 凝視; 金字塔; 死亡; 經濟; Architecture; Bartleby; Expenditure; Gaze; Panopticon; Pyramid; The economy of death; |
中文摘要 | 爾維爾在其短篇小說〈抄寫員巴托比〉中批判西方政經系統試圖建立同質性世界的努力。在紐約華爾街工作的巴托比所面對是一純然為絕對經濟理性所宰制的世界兼併、挪用、並消化所有異質性的他者,而巴托比的存在暴露出既有宰制系統內部的不足與盲點。在本文中所有的抄寫員皆身處在禁閉的空間裏、並在敘述者的凝視下辛勤工作,以符合經濟理性的生產、分配與獎懲原則;他們的身體被投資在政經符號的場域中,因為權力關係直接控制、標定、訓練他們,逼迫他們在交換系統中不斷被轉換成符號、並製造符號。後啟蒙西方世界的工作倫理是建立在利己的概念上:馬克思主義或古典政治經濟學、俗化的基督教道德觀或功利主義的倫理學皆視個人為據有強烈利己傾向、可以被組織的個體;然而怪異的巴托比洛拒絕工作,因此他的存在被視為對主流倫理觀念與經濟理性的挑戰。透過巴托比注失敗的努力與悖離常理的行逕,本文暴露出貌似良善的工作倫理裏壓制的本質與其對人性的扭曲,並同時呈現出人類追求絕對自由的不可能性與荒謬性。 |
英文摘要 | The homogeneity of the world, which is the dream of Western philosophy, science, and technology, is a nightmare. What confronts Bartleby, the scrivener in the Wall Street, is the same nightmarish world in which capitalist system attempts to master every heterogeneous element by incorporating, assimilating, or digesting all differences. Bartleby’s resistance to the system exposes a radical otherness that can never by domesticated or redeemed by the system. In other word, he is the irreducible waste product of various systematic operations or the excrement of the system that constitutes its blind spot. Imprisoned by the surrounding walls in the Wall Street and under the constant surveillance of the narrator’s eye, the copyists work diligently, complying with the economic rationality (of which the narrator is the agent) that must calculate the penalty and the reward and prescribe the appropriate techniques. Their bodies are then directly involved in the political field, as power relations have an immediate hold upon them, mark them, train them, and force them to carry out tasks and emit signs. However, the perverse Bartleby refuses to work. His existence constitutes an affront to the dominant metapsychology of Western civilization (at least, since the eighteenth century) and the assumption that we understand and control all men by self-interest. Marxism as well as “classical” politico-economic theory, utilitarian ethics as well as applied Christian morality, largely depend on the appeals to an organizable form of selfishness. But the man-from-the-underground a a Bartleby militantly denies all such appeals, and with absurd arrogance and the wisdom of failure refuses the motivations and resists the ethics of self-interest. The outrageousness of the act puts a grim cast of repression on all of the ostensibly rational orders. The psychological and ethical tactics lose their benevolent appearance and reveal a tyrannical warping of the human and a destruction of freedom, as those lonely creatures like Barley who insist on the primacy of preference and will end their subterranean lives in perversity and self-destruction. A sardonic pathos qualifies their exalted claims to individuality and unconditioned freedom. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。