查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 價值的抉擇--從佛教高僧的捨報、閉生死關談起=The Value of “Fast to Die” |
---|---|
作 者 | 李開濟; | 書刊名 | 哲學與文化 |
卷 期 | 30:1=344 2003.01[民92.01] |
頁 次 | 頁45-52 |
專 輯 | 生命倫理專題 |
分類號 | 220.113 |
關鍵詞 | 赫爾辛基宣言; 人體實驗; 自主性; 有利性; 無傷性; 公平性; 耆那教; 自我抉擇; 解脫; 涅槃; Declaration of Helsinki; Human subjects; Autonomy; Beneficence; Non-malefience; Justice; Jainism; Self determination; Moksha; Nirvana; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 中國佛教受到印度佛教與耆那教的源頭影響,有「捨報」與「閉生死關」的生死抉擇。捨報不同於自殺,佛教高僧在道業圓滿成就後才有報的舉動,不同於一般的逃避或衝動。倫理法律中的「自主性」在此充份得到展現,對於傳統儒家的孝道精神可能是完全背反,因而在中國佛教界並不鼓勵此舉,畢竟二種文化差異頗大。 |
英文摘要 | In Jainism and Buddhism “Fast to die” is a way of Maksha. It means ending this live and start next new live. Is “Fast to die” equal with Suicide? Both of them are full of autonomy in the principle of Bio-ethic. It is beneficence and justice for Indian saint, if they have practiced 12 years and wish giving away their decayed body. “Fast to die” means self-determination, It is perfect with automony, too. But in common opinion may be it is lack of some maleficence or too cruel so what. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。