查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 戰後德川儒學研究史論評--以對丸山真男《日本政治思想史研究》的批判與修正為中心
- 中國大陸近年來的日本儒學研究
- 想像東亞的共同語:評阮斐娜《帝國的太陽下:日本的臺灣及南方殖民地文學》
- The Reception of Modernity in East Asia: Japan in China's Encounter with the West
- Revisit the Relations between Japan and East
- 亞洲的超克?戰後日本近代性思想中的時間與空間問題
- 近現代東亞的四個“戰後”
- 分裂的亞洲認同:近現代東亞世界觀的對位式呈現
- 儒學與日本現代性--丸山真男論江戶儒學
- 北京時期的張我軍:被文化與政治夾擊的主體性
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 戰後德川儒學研究史論評--以對丸山真男《日本政治思想史研究》的批判與修正為中心=A Preliminary Outline of Postwar Research on Tokugawa Confucianism: Maruyama Masao's "Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan" and its Critics |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 藍弘岳; | 書刊名 | 臺大文史哲學報 |
卷期 | 57 2002.11[民91.11] |
頁次 | 頁141-143+145-183 |
分類號 | 131.3 |
關鍵詞 | 丸山真男; 德川儒學; 現代; 日本; 東亞; Maruyama Masao; Tokugawa Confucianism; Modernity; Japan; East Asia; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 戰後的德川儒學研究可說是以現代主義者丸山真男的《日本政治思想史研究》為起點。 因之,本文企圖以對該書諸論點之批判與修正為中心,來評述戰後德川儒學的研究概況。首先,筆者略述了丸山在該書中的德川儒學論之大意與問題點。在第三節則檢討了批判與修正其德川前期儒學解釋之諸研究,以及有關德川儒學與東亞儒學問之關係的各種研究。在第四節則檢討了批判與修正丸山其徂徠學解釋以及從批判丸山的徂徠學中心史觀出發所作的諸研究。在第五節中則檢討了後現代主義者等從正面批判丸山其現代主義式的方法論,而展開的德川儒學、思想論之諸研究。在結論中,筆者則在總結了以上的討論後展望了今後的德川儒學研究的可能方向和其與台灣間的關聯。 |
英文摘要 | In this paper, I provide a survey and review of the postwar Japanese research on Tokugawa Confucianism.I do this in terms of its criticism and revision of Maruyama Masao's modernist interpretation of Tokugawa Confucianism presented in the "Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan". In the first two sections of this paper, I provide an overview of Maruyama's seminal work on Tokugawa Confucianism. In the Section 3, I review the research which contributed to refutation of Maruyama's understanding of the early Tokugawa Confucianism. Following that, I review works which place Tokugawa Confucianism in the broader context of East Asian Confucianism from the Confucian tradition and comparative culture or society's point of view. In the Section 4, I discuss the studies which contributed to revise Maruyama's understanding of the Ancient Learning school (Ogyu Sorai's thought), and the scholars who studied areas and figures in Tokugawa Confucianism overlooked by Maruyama's work. In the Section 5, I survey the works that criticized Maruyama's methodology from People's thought (minshu shiso) and the postmodernism point of view. Finally, I evaluate the postmodern theorists' contribution in the recent years. In the conclusion, I argue for the importance of studying Tokugawa Confucianism in the broader context of East Asian Confucian tradition and stress the relevance of studying Tokugawa Confucianism in Taiwan. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。