頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 憲法解釋與「可訟性」原則初探--以釋字第520號解釋為例=A Preliminary Study of the Justiciability Doctrine in the Council of Grand Justice of the Republic of China (R.O.C.): A Case Study of the Interpretation No.520 |
---|---|
作 者 | 隋杜卿; | 書刊名 | 中山人文社會科學期刊 |
卷 期 | 9:1=20 2001.06[民90.06] |
頁 次 | 頁69-110 |
分類號 | 581.24 |
關鍵詞 | 可訟性; 原告適格性; 已達可訴訟狀態; 已逾可訴訟狀態; 諮詢意見; 政治問題原則; Standing; Ripeness; Mootness; Advisory opinion; Political question doctrine; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 憲法為政治與法律之結合,憲法之爭訟難免具有政治性,以大 法官會議釋憲來解決憲政爭議的理想情境,其落實既不能令人無 疑;而解決憲政爭議,又並非大法官會議釋憲是賴不可。但大法官 會議在現行釋憲制度下,又不可能完全迴避政治角力,當被迫面對 政治性議題的釋憲案件時,如何確保釋憲機關的獨立、超然及權威 性的地位,消極的意義在擺脫政治的糾葛,積極的意義則在建立民 眾之信賴,並因而鞏固憲法解釋的拘束力,那麼大法官會議善用 「可訟性」原則,並建構堅強的論理內涵,或是值得嚴肅思考的課 題。 |
英文摘要 | This paper aims to introduce the theoretical background of the `Justiciability Doctrine' and its application to the Interpretation in the Constitution. The second part of this paper describes the components of the Justiciability Doctrine developed by the U.S. Supreme Court, which includes Standing, Ripeness, Mootness, Advisory Opinion, and Political Question Doctrine. And these components serve as the theoretical foundation of further discussions by the Council of Grand Justice of the Republic of China, on how to avoid political controversies in the Interpretation. The third part intends to review the application of the `Justiciability Doctrine' by the Council of Grand Justice of the Republic of China, and the final part discusses the applicability of the Doctrine to the Interpretation No.520. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。