頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 迥異於康德觀點的盧梭「政治人類學」思想詮釋=Reflections on Rousseau's Political Thought: Political Anthropology Other Than Kantism |
---|---|
作 者 | 王賀白; | 書刊名 | 臺灣人文生態研究 |
卷 期 | 3:2 2001.07[民90.07] |
頁 次 | 頁45-73 |
分類號 | 146.42、146.42 |
關鍵詞 | 政治人類學; Political anthropology; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 透過李維史陀著作《憂鬱的熱帶》啟發,本文以「政治大類學」觀點詮釋盧梭的政治思想。文中發現,康德詮釋的盧梭與盧梭本文思想實有相當出入,特別是關於自然狀態與民主的看法。一開始,本文以康德批判哲學為基點,進行「唯理論傳統的政治哲學批判」與「經驗論傳統的經驗政治批判」,嘗試彰顯盧梭政治思想的獨特性;之後則企圖以「政治大類學」觀點重新解釋盧梭。本文認為,盧梭文本所描述的,實有「自然狀態」、「前現代道德政治」、「現代經濟政治」與「未來民主政治」等康德未能理解的不同歷史實體,並且在時空上是一個依序演進的「政治人類學」歷程。筆者認為,雖然盧梭意識到這個歷程,但他並沒有清楚說明它,以致未能找出達到「未來民主政治」的可行路徑。本文認為「政治人類學」的論釋是重要的,它不僅可以澄清許多人對盧梭的誤解,同時對找尋可行路徑應會有重要裨益。 |
英文摘要 | It is usually assumed that Kant is the best reader of Rousseau. I will argue that there are many differences between Kant and Rousseau. From the beginning, I try to demonstrate the solitude of Rousseau's political thought on the basis of Kant's interpretation. Thus, this paper develops the critiques of political philosophy from rationalism and empirical politics from empiricism. After illumination above, I explore Rousseau's political thought from a view of political anthropology other than Kantism. The political anthropology I describe, inspired by Rousseau's context, can be considered as the process that has a linear evolution from "state of nature", "moral politics of the premodern", "economic politics of the modern" to "democratic politics of the future". Yet, paradoxically, Rousseau was aware of it rather than explained it well. I hope these reflections can reiterate the consistence of Rousseau, and find out proper approaches toward the Rousseau's scheme. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。