查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 現代性危機與基督宗教學術的「志業」觀=The Crisis of Modernity and the "Beruf" of Christian Wissenscraft |
---|---|
作者 | 曾慶豹; Chin, Ken-pa; |
期刊 | 中原學報 |
出版日期 | 20020600 |
卷期 | 30:2 2002.06[民91.06] |
頁次 | 頁213-229 |
分類號 | 242 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 歷史主義; 學術; 科學; 志業; 價值; 倫理; 自由; 責任; Historicism; Academic; Science; Vocation; Value; Ethics; Freedom; Responsibility; |
中文摘要 | 基督宗教思想家越來越意識到它與現代性議題的關聯性,至少「基督宗教學術」這種提法本身即是「現代」意識下的產物。不管是追問作為學術科目的基督宗教研究,或基督宗教學術研究與社會文化,或與大學的理念或教育,身處於以現代知識形態的大學底下,現代意識與基督宗教學術(神學)的互動不僅牽動著基督宗教的建立,當然,它也可能是衝擊著基督宗教學術的一項危機。從施萊馬赫到特洛爾奇的所謂「現代」神學,由此而生。 現代性的危機即是生活價值的危機,也就是倫理的危機。從實證主義到歷史主義,它們對基督宗教學術研究所帶來的衝擊,即是把價值排除到研究領域之外,正確地說,是把基督宗教學術從具體的生活中抽離出來,韋伯如此,特洛爾奇也如此。 韋伯把現代社會形容為一個「價值多神」的時代,而學術或科學則在此脈絡之下必須堅守一種「價值中立」的立場。然而潘霍華則重新看待「價值多神論」的危機,韋伯的「價值中立」後果將導致實踐的缺如,因此,潘霍華重提倫理的意義,因為一個沒有倫理的志業將喪失了責任意識,同時,它將失了其實踐的意味O 基督宗教學術作為一種志業即是把握到現代生活底下的人必須自由且負責任地活著,這就是人的天職O |
英文摘要 | Christian religious thinkers have more and more perceived its relationship with issues of modernity, at the least “Christianreligious academic" such a matter is in itself a product of “modern"ideology. Be it those that in quest for the academic exercise of Christian religious studies, or Christian reIigious academic studies and social culture, or with university ideaI or education, Iocating under the modernknowledge ideology of the university, modern ideol- ogy and Christian religious academic's mutual interactive not only enabled the construction of Christian religion, of course, it also is an impact on Christian religious academic as a crisis. From SchIeiermacher to Troeltsch's so caIled “moderntheology", arise from here. Modernity's crisis is life value crisis, is also the crisis of ethics. From positivism to historicism, their impact on Christian reIigious academic, is to reject value outside of the sphere of academic studies, to be precise, is to isolate Christian religious academic studies from reaI life setting, so is Weber and Troeltsch. Weber describes the modern society as a “valuepan theistic" era, and so academic or science must within this paradigm insist on a kind of “valuefree" position. But Bonhoeffer re-assessed “valuepantheism" as a crisis, Weber's“value free" would lead to practical handicap, therefore, Bonhoeffer re-asserts the meaning of ethion, because a profession without ethics is one without responsibility, at the same time, it would have lost its practical purpose. Christian religious academic as a kind of profession, toaffirm human under the modern living must be free and live responsibily this is human's inborn responsibility. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。