查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 從敦煌伯二五一0號殘卷--論論語鄭氏注的一些問題=Some Problems of the Cheng Hsuan's Annotations of Lun-Yu in Comparison with Those in Tun-Huang Extant Scroll P2510 |
---|---|
作 者 | 孔仲溫; | 書刊名 | 中山人文學報 |
卷 期 | 5 1997.01[民86.01] |
頁 次 | 頁45-63 |
分類號 | 097.1 |
關鍵詞 | 敦煌; 論語; 鄭玄注; 論語集解; 孔安國; 周氏; Tun-huang p2510; Lun-yu; Cheng hsuan's annotation; Variorum lun-yu; Kung an-kuo; Chou; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文是將敦煌P2510號《論語鄭玄注》殘卷,與何晏《論語集解》比較,並討論其中一些相關問題。全文分四節,重點在二、三兩節。第二節是敦煌本鄭注與《論語集解》鄭注之比較。透過比較確知二者大致相同者有22條,佔69%,而《集解》刪略或增益者有7條,佔22%,另有三條是二者不同的,這種不同有可能是版本的差異,或是何晏所改易的。第三節是論鄭注與孔包周馬諸注的關係及其相關問題。本文是把《集解》裡所引孔安國、包威、周氏、馬融諸家的說法與鄭注所引做一比較。其中以引孔安國注為最多,而經本文論證,孔注即使是偽作的,也當在鄭玄之前,而非清人所稱為何晏、王肅所偽。至於周氏,本文也證明非晚於鄭玄的周生烈,應是東漢與包咸注《張侯論》的周氏。 |
英文摘要 | This essay compares Cheng Hsuan's annotations of Lu-yu in Tun-huang p2510 extant scroll with Ho Yen's variorum of Lun-yu. In comparison with Ho's variorum, the Cheng's annotations in Tunhuang scroll have 22 items identical with those in the variorum, totaling 69 percent; 3 items differ in some places, totaling 22 percent; 3 items disagree completely. In the third part of this essay, I dicuss the relationship of Cheng's annotations with those of Kung An-kuo, Pao Hsien, Chou, and Ma Jung. Furthermore, I compare Ho's quotations of the four annotators. The finding is: even Kung's annotations were made up by later scholars, they were earlier than those of Cheng Hsuan's and not made up by Ho Yen and Wang Su as Ch'ing Dynasty scholars have claimed. As for the Chou, he should be the chou of the coannotators of "Essay on Chang Duke", not Chou Shen-lei. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。