查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 德國法中「社會自我管制」機制初探=A Study of Social Self-Regulation in German Law |
---|---|
作 者 | 詹鎮榮; | 書刊名 | 政大法學評論 |
卷 期 | 78 2004.04[民93.04] |
頁 次 | 頁79-120 |
分類號 | 588.1 |
關鍵詞 | 社會自我管制; 國家管制; 國家最後決定責任; 合作國家; 責任分配; 民營化; 效率原則; 補充性原則; 合作原則; 基本權拋棄; Social self-regulation; Government regulation; The threat of government regulation; A Cooperative state; Distribution of responsibility; Privatization; The principle of efficiency; The principle of subsidiarity; The principle of cooperation; The disclaimer of human rights; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 在社會型態急遽變遷與國家任務日益擴張之今日,命令、禁止等傳統之高權強制手段出現管制失靈之現象。現代國家為維持其公益保障責任之法治國要求,遂納入合作國家責任分配之新思維,採行「社會自我管制」之間接管制手段,以解決國家直接管制失靈問題。社會自我管制之概念特徵在於私經濟主體自為管制之「自願性」與「公益取向性」。是故,較之於傳統之高權管制手段,其優點在於提升管制效率與減輕國家負擔。在德國現行法秩序中,社會自我管制手段尤其被廣為應用在環境與經濟法、媒體法以及電信法領域,獲得實定法上之明文肯認。在不同法領域中,國家與社會間管制責任分配之情形亦可能有所不同,而使社會自我管制在具體個案中呈現出國家參與密度各異之次類型。除實定法之外,吾人亦可從效率原則、補充性原則與合作原則等法律原則中導出社會自我管制之法理上基礎,而承認其得作為國家管制手段之一種類型的法之容許性。縱然如此,國家採行社會自我管制手段非無界限,而須顧及到基本權保障與法治國家公益維繫之要求。德國法制對於「受國家規制之社會自我管制」手段的建構與實行經驗,或可提供我國在從事行政革新時,除行政任務民營化與解除管制之外的另類思考方向與契機。 |
英文摘要 | Due to drastic changes in society and the enormous expansion of the role of the state at the present time, traditional mandatory government regulation such as commands and prohibitions has failed. Social self-regulation may improve this situation, appearing as a preferred option to that of a purelygovernment solution. The idea of "self-regulation" comains two indispensable elements, namely: the voluntary nature of self-regulation and the protection of public interests by society. In Germany, self-regulation by individuals and society is embodied in environmental law, in media law, and in telecommunications law. Theoretically, social self-regulation contains three models: pure social self-regulation without governmental benefit and threat, social self-regulation with governmental benefit and threat, and finally social self-regulation based on agreement between the public and private sectors. The legal basic for social self-regulation can be found also in the principles of efficiency, subsidiarity and cooperation. From a constitutional viewpoint, social self-regulation is prior to mandatory government regulation. However, social self-regulation has its own constitutional limits, while the Protection of human rights and public interests are especially meaningful. The development of social self-regulation in Germany can offer Taiwan ideas that may serve to improve the efficiency of regulation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。