頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 王充思想是否符合科學標準之評議=A Comment on Whether Wang Ch'ung's Thought Conforms to Scientific Standards |
---|---|
作 者 | 劉謹銘; | 書刊名 | 漢學研究 |
卷 期 | 21:1=42 2003.06[民92.06] |
頁 次 | 頁391-411 |
分類號 | 122.6 |
關鍵詞 | 王充; 論衡; 科學; 波普; 類推; Wang Ch'ung; Lun heng; Science; Popper; Analogy; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 近代自胡適先生在30年代初期發表〈王充的論衡〉一文以來,不少學者對於王充思想是否具備科學性一事長期爭議不休。本論文旨在對於王充思想是否符合科學之標準的問題,作一徹底的解決。 首先,筆者以諸家說法作一深入分析,並揭示個人評斷之理據。其次,透過波普(K. R. Popper)對於科學與非科學劃界之探討,確立此一問題之分判標準。再者,對於眾人爭論不休的類推法,則借助於邏輯學以及人類認識模式之考察,以釐定王充所用的類比法型態及其所違犯之錯誤究竟為何。最後,對於眾人隨順著胡氏的價值標準,而將「科學與否」視為評價王充思想依據之不適切,提出檢討。 |
英文摘要 | Ever since Hu Shuh published his article "Wang Ch'ung's Lun heng"王充的論衡 in the early 1930s, scholars have been debating whether Wang Ch'ung's ideas were scientific. This paper aims to offer a through resolution to the question of whether Wang Ch'ung's thought conforms to scientific standards. First, the author provides an analysis of various views on this issue and reveals their underlying theoretical basis. Next, a standard for analyzing and judging this issue is put forward using K. R. Popper's demarcation of the scientific and the non-scientific. After this, the author employs logic theory and the idea of cognitive patterns to clarify the type of analogy Wang Ch'ung uses and the mistakes he made. Finally, there is a discussion as to the appropriateness of accepting Hu Shih's value standard and measuring Wang Ch'ung's thought in terms of whether it is scientific. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。